SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Can't see Bill abandoning his secret Moon spying base and giving the whole thing to Butler.
He hasn't signed yet because they still cannot find what he asked for.
The Patriots don't have to offer anything, he is under contract. If another team wants him, they forfeit a 1st. Any agent expecting them to rip up his contract as if he's a UFA, is a moron.
The majority will feel as though the Patriots would simply squat on his rights by forcing him to stay here one last year, but Belichick has also shown a pattern of breaking free from problematic relationships. I think he feels it's best for player, team, and coach.Four tangible possibilities?:
1- Butler signs a contract that is discounted based on getting a big payday one year early.
2- Butler finds a team that wants to sign him for the nig money and Patriots get a first round draft choice.
3- Butler and his agent eventually accept the hardball tactic with BB won't pay off into a top UFA contract. Butler signs/plays out his RFA contract
4- Butler holds out and takes it right up to week 1 or more. (Maybe he can gets a no Franchise tag commitment for 2018?? Or maybe a team is found to make a deal??)
Likeliest is.... 3? We'll know by April 20 if he signs the offer sheet?
Outside of that the propaganda tact of negotiations will be thick enough to slice with a knife,
This this and this. Anyone that thinks BB is going to give up the RFA year isn't paying attention.The Patriots don't have to offer anything, he is under contract. If another team wants him, they forfeit a 1st. Any agent expecting them to rip up his contract as if he's a UFA, is a moron.
Signing the tender right now would be stupid. You call his agent a "major problem" but what you mean is that he is representing the best interests of his client and not the best interest of the team - which is what agents are *supposed* to do.Derek Simpson is not an NFL agent which is a major problem, he has no experience in this realm.. thus he seems to be screwing things up for Butler.. Simpson is controlling the narrative, which will not bait the Patriots into some sort of war of words.
Malcolm Butler is pretty much today where Stephon Gilmore was last year at this time.. for some reason he wants to leapfrog the CBA and get his big pay day now.
I am a huge MB fan, but he is getting really crappy advise from his so called "agent"...
Now Simpson says he is shopping MB, and supposedly several teams are interested, so the expectation will be that a team will give up a 1st round pick and pay MB top tier CB money??
Here is the solution sign the tender, and coincidentally ask the Pats to present an offer that will take place commencing 2018... that may solve a bunch of issues.
Butler would never be offered Gilmore's contract. Any Butler/Patriots package would include his cost controlled 2017 RFA tender price....no more. Gilmore is receiving compensation based on 5 unrestricted years.
Furthermore.....it has been reported that Butler's agent requested NE forfeit their 2017 RFA control over Butler....hence the statement..."asking for the moon."
Butler's agent's two likely motives:
1) See if BB blinks. (he didn't......BB went shopping instead)
2) Expedite Butler's exit from NE to a team willing to relinquish the leverage they would possess if Butler's rights were traded.
Butler, his agent, and the football world know what Belichick values....a focused player in a single objective locker room. How likely will Bill keep Butler on the roster this year with no new contract when the conversation next year would be...will NE franchise Butler.
Where in the world are you getting the idea he had anything that even remotely resembles an offer of 5 years, $44 million??If that's what went down the past year, that his agent has been seeking UFA money for 2016 & 2017 as part of a 4 or 5 year deal, then that was a big mistake. The total dollar value should have been very straightforward: $1m for 2016, $4m for 2017, and say $13m for each year beyond. So a 5 year deal would have been $44m.
The key advantage to Butler is he'd have received a big up-front bonus, say $14m, with the other $30m spread over the 5 years as salary - say $1m, $4m, $8m, $8m, $9m - which would have totaled $27m for the first 3 years, with most of it guaranteed. Instead now he's in this world of uncertainty.
that was an example to show how NE wants Butler & his agent to view the $$ in the context of his leverage/FA status. i.e., count 2016 as $1m, 2017 as $4m, 2018 to 2020 at the market rate of about $12m, and make a package out of that with an upfront bonus. $44m total, not $60m, an average of $8.8m/yr, not $12m. It's very realistic that this type of discussion occurred, and that Butler didn't like the sounds of $8.8m average when lesser players were making $12m & more.Where in the world are you getting the idea he had anything that even remotely resembles an offer of 5 years, $44 million??
Seriously, you people are criticizing Butler (and his agent) for not signing these completely made-up, hypothetical deals that exist only in your imagination.
Yes I get it. He is a RFA. He can't force a deal as if he wasn't an RFA. But he isn't going to take $40M when he will get $65 M (if not more) within 1 year.that was an example to show how NE wants Butler & his agent to view the $$ in the context of his leverage/FA status. i.e., count 2016 as $1m, 2017 as $4m, 2018 to 2020 at the market rate of about $12m, and make a package out of that with an upfront bonus. $44m total, not $60m, an average of $8.8m/yr, not $12m. It's very realistic that this type of discussion occurred, and that Butler didn't like the sounds of $8.8m average when lesser players were making $12m & more.
BB knows the market better than anyone, and as shown by the Gilmore signing he has no problem paying the market when he wants the player. But he won't rip up lower years salaries and start paying as if those didn't exist.