- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
.................
As I said, I was not changing the subject. Thanks for verifying it.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments..................
Oh, just a note on that fabulous Steelers development crew:
They cut Harrison 3 times in 2 years. It's not as if they were committed to the cause from day one with him. The Ravens, another linebacker-based team, also cut him. Yes, lets point to him as proof of the superiority of the Steelers way.
Oh, just a note on that fabulous Steelers development crew:
They cut Harrison 3 times in 2 years.
That probably has a lot more to do with the talent these teams had at LB at the time. In my opinion that says a lot about their ability to fill a team with quality LBs, while we're stuck with Pierre frickin Woods, Crable and Redd.
Because it was tough to crack that lineup. Vrabel couldn't either.
By contrast, we have at least 4 UDFA that might easily make this team.
Yep..... Clint C. Kriewaldt
Tough nut to crack.
He had a 9 year NFL career.
You think Redd Crable Woods and Guyton will?
I don't know. I'm just wondering how the Steelers' brilliant crew chose that career special team player over Harrison if they are so much better at the linebacker thing than the Patriots are. Was Clint the #1 overall pick of the draft by some chance?
Pittsburgh has better LBers than us.
Pittsburgh drafts LBers better than us.
We do not, I repeat..DO NOT...have to be the best in EVERY area to win a Superbowl.
Pittsburgh has a very weak O-line and its WR's are nothing to write home about.
This is how the NFL works - if it were possible to have 5 or 6 1st round draft picks every year then maybe we would be elite in every area.
Dominate with your strenghts and cover your weaknesses - thats the name of the game in this era.
Maybe to play special teams?
He had a 9 year NFL career.
You think Redd Crable Woods and Guyton will?
I agree 100%. I'd like to see some attempt at improving the LB situation. We don't even need to be near as good as our own team when Parcells picks and Vrabel were in their prime.
Pittsburgh has better LBers than us.
Pittsburgh drafts LBers better than us.
We do not, I repeat..DO NOT...have to be the best in EVERY area to win a Superbowl.
Pittsburgh has a very weak O-line and its WR's are nothing to write home about.
This is how the NFL works - if it were possible to have 5 or 6 1st round draft picks every year then maybe we would be elite in every area.
Dominate with your strenghts and cover your weaknesses - thats the name of the game in this era.
So what? Eric Alexander has had a 6 year NFL career, which could easily go to/past nine.
Quick question: how many times have you seen Crable and Redd play?
You haven't. You have no idea if they're any good or not, so by extension you have absolutely no idea whatsoever whether the LB situation is being improved or not. Which is fine, in of itself, since there's no way that you could. But did it ever occur to you that, just maybe, Belichick hasn't just decided to go into the year with a crap LB corps? Maybe he's actually seen something from these guys. All of these guys that you're clamoring for now were unknowns before they were given a chance to step in and make an impact. Last year, everyone was freaking out about ILB depth, but Guyton and Mayo stepped in and established themselves. At OLB, we have two established starters (Woods flat-out earned the job last year- dunno what you guys were watching that made you think he's a JAG) and two guys who may very well be able to step in and establish themselves the same way.
This is how football teams are built in the real world. I don't know what fantasy land you guys are living in where every position gets magically filled by an established pro bowl-caliber veteran (but not *too* old because as soon as you hit 32, everyone here writes you off for being on the decline, like Adalius apparently is), but that doesn't exist. No team does that.
So what? Eric Alexander has had a 6 year NFL career, which could easily go to/past nine. Doesn't make him a good LB. And yes, I could easily see any of the guys you mentioned having nine year careers. They all have a lot of potential, and Woods and Guyton have already proven themselves to be capable players. I doubt they all will, but I wouldn't be surprised at all if one, two, three, or all four of them do.
There are opposite extremes at work here. On one hand, you don't want to be too quick to anoint guys, I get that. A couple years ago, we all thought Eugene Wilson would be captaining our secondary for the next decade. OTOH, the opposite extreme is just as irrational. The only way to build a nucleus of homegrown talent, which the Pats absolutely rely on, is to give them opportunities to step up. That's what the Pats' draftees have always done in the past, and it looks like they may be getting a chance to do it at OLB this year. I, for one, am looking forward to it.
IMO the real issue is that Pats fans are such chicken littles that they freak the hell out because we only have two Pro Bowlers in our LB corps. It's ridiculous and stupid.
Look, I'm glad you're thrilled with our linebacker situation. I'm not. I've seen Crable, he jumps well and has skinny legs. you've seen him more than me? Redd played a little on special teams.
It's possible we could get top starters that were overlooked by every team including us multiple times. Maybe they'll follow Pitts Harrison and become starters after five years, when A.D. is 37.
Again, if you think we have the best LB corps we can afford, that's great.
You do realize that you've already conceded most of this argument, knowingly or unknowingly, have had the parts you haven't conceded complete discredited and are just pissing and moaning like NEM and Maverick about the O.C. du jour, right?