- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,724
- Reaction score
- 16,526
I think that Belichick values Arrington more than you do as an outside corner as well as a nickel. For me, I think that we don't value the nickel back enough. After all, that position plays more than many starters.
We think that Belichick could certainly have done better than Arrington for $4M a year. Clearly, Belichick evaluated the situation differently.
I don't think that Belichick had any intention of starting rookies. If he didn't sign Talib and Arrington, two other veterans would have been signed. One rookie corner is plenty.
We think that Belichick could certainly have done better than Arrington for $4M a year. Clearly, Belichick evaluated the situation differently.
I don't think that Belichick had any intention of starting rookies. If he didn't sign Talib and Arrington, two other veterans would have been signed. One rookie corner is plenty.
Is Arrington's injury significant? I haven't heard anything myself.
On another note, Arrington should thank his lucky stars for that 4 million dollar AAV deal. That tells me one of three things:
1. Belichick feels that the market for CBs was off a bit and/or it will rise once again, and that 4 million will be a fair amount for a nickle CB who can start outside in a pinch (with major dropoff in my opinion)
2. Belichick was unsure about the prospects of bringing back Talib and did not want to gamble by needing to start rookies at both outside CB and nickle CB positions with losing both Talib and Arrington
3. Belichick just feels that Arrington's value and talent are worthy of a starter's salary, thus in the range of some of this free agent classes top percentage of CBs. He obviously feels (or felt) that Arrington could start on the outside without too much drawback, because that isn't a nickle CB's pact