- Joined
- Dec 23, 2004
- Messages
- 5,250
- Reaction score
- 877
I saw guys like peter king retweeting this saying good job. Why didnt he write this?
Because he is a two faced jerk, owned and operated by the NFL.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I saw guys like peter king retweeting this saying good job. Why didnt he write this?
That was in the divisional round. The Raiders still had to beat the Steelers to get to the Super Bowl after that. (The Steelers were missing both Franco Harris and Rocky Bleier in that game).
Karma. May she be a ***** slap to Roger and his cronies.If we make it to the Super Bowl, then the mainstream may raise its focus on Deflategate--and it wouldn't be a bad thing.
Too close to the story. Which is another way of saying, he is Goodell's *****.I saw guys like peter king retweeting this saying good job. Why didnt he write this?
Although true, this fact also provides the NFL management strong personal reasons for ensuring that the Patriots do not make it to the Super Bowl: because the NFL management's actions would not withstand the glare of objective public scrutiny, they will do what they can to minimize that scrutiny.If we make it to the Super Bowl, then the mainstream may raise its focus on Deflategate--and it wouldn't be a bad thing.
I just wish Patriots fans would show some bollocks and take the NFL head on to get the million they stole and the picks back.
It saddens me more that the fans are just letting them get on with what they are doing, whilst raging daily on MBs. Get of your arses and be properly proactive. Not a stupid poll online, bring all the Patriots MBs together and write a letter that all can copy and paste to anyone that will listen...
If Gash was injured, it was news to him. He's stated numerous times he the most surprised of anyone to not have been active.
If Gash was injured, it was news to him. He's stated numerous times he the most surprised of anyone to not have been active.
Wow, that's the first I've heard of it. If true, then that was a bad move by Parcells.
I thought that Parcells mentioned Gash by name during the AFCC presentation?
While the definition of "troll" and "nasty" could be debated or even litigate, most forms of "racist" speech are generally not "protected" speech.Removing troll comments, or racist comments, or nasty comments from a privately owned site is not censorship of free speech. The concept of free speech doesn't apply on a privately owned medium.
No speech is 'protected' speech on a private site. That's the point.While the definition of "troll" and "nasty" could be debated or even litigate, most forms of "racist" speech are generally not "protected" speech.
I appreciate your Responses, but I'm calling ********.
You squeal and squawk at all of us for lacking the "bollocks" to "take the NFL head on", and then you squawk and squeal at us to "get off your arses and be properly proactive", but when you're challenged to tell us what you'd suggest, your answer is to get everybody together and...write a freaking letter??
Yeah.
That'll show'm.
The only one with enough Leverage to have a Chance to defeat this Atrocity was Kraft, who once again showed, it gives me no Pleasure to say, that he lacked the Courage to take on the rest of the League.
The Idea that the Fans of 1 Team could somehow overwhelm the League by writing a Letter is pathetic.
All you're doing is pissing and moaning about the pissing and moaning, yet declaring that it somehow means that you've got more guts than the rest of us. And that, my friend, is ********.
If you're a First Amendment Lawyer, I'll take your word for that, but it is my understanding that racist or hate language is not protected on a site that can be accessed by the public.No speech is 'protected' speech on a private site. That's the point.
Thanks for clarifying, but I was really centered on "I can describe Kraft's success as an owner in two words. Brady and Belichick.".
No Kraft = No Belichick.
And he was still the most successful Pats owner even before he went to crazy lengths and a 1st rounder to get that "duplicitous pond scum" of a loser head coach.......
But I do apologize since my rant may have been a bit harsh. It wasn't directed at you personally but at the school of thought that wants to throw out everything Kraft has done for 21 years over two (admittedly) major bad decisions.
Too close to the story. Which is another way of saying, he is Goodell's *****.
Might be better to have it coming from mainstream media not sports media, and then have the sports media pick it up and amplify it.
Of course not. But my point is that NO speech is protected on a privately owned site. It doesn't matter at all that the public can access it. You can have your posts here deleted for any reason whatsoever. The same way on blogs. And its the same way at Florio's site. His site, his rules. Protected speech only applies to the government.If you're a First Amendment Lawyer, I'll take your word for that, but it is my understanding that racist or hate language is not protected on a site that can be accessed by the public.
If you're a First Amendment Lawyer, I'll take your word for that, but it is my understanding that racist or hate language is not protected on a site that can be accessed by the public.
Ok. I was wrongThere is no first amendment exception of any kind for racist or hate speech. It is fully protected under the first amendment. Regardless of what pissant [insert 3-letter acronym]s would prefer.
The govt can create a forum and declare it to be about something and delete off-topic stuff, sure. But within that topic they can't privilege some viewpoints over others.
Ok I was wrongOf course not. But my point is that NO speech is protected on a privately owned site. It doesn't matter at all that the public can access it. You can have your posts here deleted for any reason whatsoever. The same way on blogs. And its the same way at Florio's site. His site, his rules. Protected speech only applies to the government.