flutie2phelan
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 1,145
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.braveht said:I don't think this is a waiver situation. He can sign with whoever he wants.
Who or what makes the decision that a player is released or waived? My understanding is that a 'released' player is a free agent that all 32 teams can sign. A 'waived' player then has a system in place, I believe, that uses last year’s final standings as who gets first shot at the waived player (eg. The Texans would get first shot if they put in a waiver claim). Can a team waive a player if they know that another team in their division needs that position but has no chance of receiving him because of their record from the previous year?
Harold Freiter
If a player has less than four years of service time and he gets cuts, he is waived and goes through the claims process that you accurately described. After the third week of the season, the process reverts to 2006 records in inverse order. If a player has four or more years of time, then he is released and thus becomes a free agent. The only change to this occurs after the trading deadline, at which point every player is subject to the waiver process. I’m not sure I understand your question about the division. If a team wants to release a player it’s not likely going to be affected by another team’s needs. Like Belichick always says, he’s going to do what’s in the best interest of his team. He’s not going to worry about another team. And whether a player is waived or released there’s no way of knowing for sure which team, if any, are going to claim him.
Paul Perillo
Or Jonathan Smith after we activate Bam Bam. I could change my mind on that if Smith looks good on returns this week.flutie2phelan said:Kelvin Kight.
flutie2phelan said:Kelvin Kight.
Harrison37 said:Didn't Davenport get in a little trouble for taking a dump in some coed's closet when he was in college?
Or was that some other troubled football collegian?
lobster said:Cobbs lucked out because he gets termination pay, as they call it. I believe the rule is every player on the roster for the first regular season game is eligible for termination pay, which means Cobbs salary is effectively guaranteed at $225K or whatever the Rookie minimum is.
Probably only the Steelers would be interested in him for the PS because his salary is so high.
patsfan55 said:ok so doesnt it first go to a team that puts a waiver claim in for him to be on their 53, then if nobody claims him that way, to whoever claims him to be on their ps??
if so, id put a claim on him for the ps
You have to wonder if re-signing him back to the 53 man roster at some point in the season would reinstate the trade?Miguel said:http://www.pittsburghlive.com/x/pittsburghtrib/sports/s_469706.html
"Because of yesterday's development, the Steelers no longer owe the Patriots any compensation for Cobbs (5-foot-9, 210 pounds)."