Welcome to PatsFans.com

CBS Sportsline has the Pats picking another TE in the first round....

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by HEY BRO! WHAT UP?, Feb 11, 2007.

  1. HEY BRO! WHAT UP?

    HEY BRO! WHAT UP? Banned

    Joined:
    Mar 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,370
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    I want to throw up. If his name isn't Vernon Davis, I don't want him! Look at their explanations, just plain ridiculous. My only wish is that the Pats do not take another TE in the first round.

    http://www.sportsline.com/nfl/story/9961542
  2. zippo59

    zippo59 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    5,072
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Definitely weird, but I can't complain about the Anothony Spencer pick.
  3. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,088
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +37 / 2 / -3

    #24 Jersey

    His explanation for the Miller pick is fine - no holes in his reasoning. BTW, Rob Rang is as solid as they come for media draft guys. In his mock for NFLDraftScout he has us taking Amobi Okoye and Spencer but in this newer one he's got Okoye higher now.
  4. Seymour93

    Seymour93 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,681
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    If we draft a TE in the 1st round, I'll fly to NE and b!tch slap BB. There are so many other needs it's insane to even think about drafting a TE that high even if Graham goes.
  5. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,088
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +37 / 2 / -3

    #24 Jersey

    If we lose Graham, Samuel and TBC while signing no FA, then sure. It's a fairly easy scenario to see us signing a few second tier FA and having few holes heading into the draft. It's impossible to really do mocks before FA but Belichick has shown beyond a shadow of a doubt that he values TE highly on draft day.
  6. SeanBruschi54

    SeanBruschi54 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,422
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    This has to be one of the worst drafts i have seen done up yet.

    Detroit? Gaines Adams? Yea they dont need a QB or OT or anything. Just sjip over two studs in college in Joe Thomas and Brady Quinn.

    Miami, as much as miami needs o line help thats not there biggest concern. They need to improve their secondary with the first pick.

    Carriker to San Fran? i dont see why not but a small reach

    Buffalo taking Jarrett, this move reaks of marv levy they have LB problems and losing Clements yet they take a WR when they already have two solid ones. Nice one.:rolleyes:

    Carolina and Dwayne Bowe. Its a big no. Panthers will draft defense here no matter if its safety linebacker etc they will get someone.

    Had no idea Revis was the best CB now.

    Cowboys picking Ginn. is egh. No real need for him with Glenn and Owens.

    Patriots taking Spencer is a reach seriously.

    Zach Miller? Terrible pick.
  7. zippo59

    zippo59 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    5,072
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    I wouldn't be suprised at all if Miami drafted an offensive lineman in the first round.

    Their defense is certainly aging but that unit is not the biggest of their problems. They have had issues at QB, and if Culpepper is going to be the guy they need a line that can keep him upright, especially because he is coming off an injury.

    Most Fins fans are hoping for an O-lineman or a QB with the first pick.

    Besides, IMO this is a relatively deep draft for DB's, especially safeties. Chances are a CB like McCauley, Wilson, or Houston will be available by their early second round pick, or a safety like Meriweather or Griffin.
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2007
  8. Seymour93

    Seymour93 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,681
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +10 / 0 / -0

    I agree. We can't tell anything for sure until our FA's situations are settled, but even if Graham leaves and Samuel & TBC are re-signed, it would be a massive mistake to use a 1st rounder on a TE. Thomas has shown he can block. Watson is basically a WR trapped in a TE's body. So we have two solid TE's right there. Sure we need depth if Graham leaves. Jermaine Wiggins is likely to be a FA and I have no problem with taking a TE in the mid rounds. We wen't through so much crap just to get an extra 1st so at least draft a DB, LB, WR, or even OL. These positions need an influx of youth. TE is not a concern.
  9. BelichickFan

    BelichickFan B.O. = Fugazi PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    31,088
    Likes Received:
    29
    Ratings:
    +37 / 2 / -3

    #24 Jersey

    Personally I wouldn't take a TE in round one. I think we all liked what we saw in Thomas - in fact he really excites me. But looking at history, we'd all better be prepared for the possibility. However if we're passing up on the likes of Patrick Willis or, my favorite, Brandon Merriweather, that TE better be REAL good :)
  10. captain stone

    captain stone Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    8,341
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    If the patsies draft a TE in the 1st round, I'll drive the 7 hours to NE, meet you there, and we'll give BB a double b!tch-slap. Even if Grahambo is already gone.

    The days of ignoring the LB position are (or should be) over.
  11. DarrylS

    DarrylS PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    40,315
    Likes Received:
    19
    Ratings:
    +19 / 0 / -0

    PFT has us taking an O tackle for the first pick and a CB for our second pick.
  12. Mike the Brit

    Mike the Brit Minuteman Target PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,377
    Likes Received:
    16
    Ratings:
    +18 / 1 / -0

    Rang's mock draft is all about second-guessing teams' needs, but the Patriots look for "Best Player Available". What's more, he misinterprets the Patriots' needs when he says that they need a tight end if Graham leaves because they like to use a lot of two-tight-end sets. It's the other way round: they use two tight ends because they have talented tight ends they want to get on the field.

    That said, if there is an outstanding tight end available, be prepared for us to pick him. Somehow, I don't think it is likely.
  13. SaCaCh

    SaCaCh Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    1,154
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I 've thought we would take a TE in the first, no surprise there. Now its down to whether BB has evaluated one that high. We will see.
  14. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    19,975
    Likes Received:
    24
    Ratings:
    +28 / 1 / -0

    I think the situation is fairly simple. Posters here, as in every year, don't value TE's as highly as bb and pioli. They've used 2 firsts and third (plus the pick to trade up to get graham) to get what we had last year plus all the picks on failures long gone. This doesn't count Mills, who is a mystery man.

    If Graham goes, we will certainly look at TE. To think that bb and pioli won't consider a TE with two first round picks shows a misunderstanding of how the team values positions in the draft.

    I recognize that it is POSSIBLE that the FO values Watson and Thomas so much that they will let Graham go, and sign JAG free agent to replace him, and think everything that is fine. I just don't see it.

    BTW, the fact that the FO chooses to bring in veteran linebackers year after year, instead of drafting them, does NOT mean that they don't value the position. It simply means, that in THEIR experience, they'd rather train UDFA's like Alexander, Woods and Mays or get their linebackers from other teams like Colvin, Vrabel, Cox, Phifer and Seau (and yes, Beisel, Brown and Gardner). Just by the way, this regime has drafted five linebackers in six years. None are signed for the 2007 roster. The bottom line is that this position has been a strength.

    Defensive backs are another matter. They will definitely draft a defensive back or two, especially if Samuel is not expected to play.

    The issue is VALUE and perceived need. I think that posters here have different views than than the FO regarding first round value by position, and the need at TE.

    Whether any of the TE's will be an appropriate value pick is another question entirely.
  15. Tippett56

    Tippett56 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    38
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    It was worth the read if only for the line.....

    'The Bengals' defense continues to be more dangerous off the field than on it.'

    :rofl:
  16. dtbrks

    dtbrks Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    1,927
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Stranger things have happened.
    Maybe the LB position get's filled in via free agency.. Thomas from Baltimore
  17. SeanBruschi54

    SeanBruschi54 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    3,422
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    #24 Jersey

    But Thomas is only an OLB and we need younger help inside.
  18. ctpatsfan77

    ctpatsfan77 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2005
    Messages:
    20,243
    Likes Received:
    33
    Ratings:
    +34 / 0 / -1

    Right now, there are only four positions I can't see BB/SP picking in the first round: QB, K, P, and LS. About the only other thing that could surprise me is if BB/SP spent BOTH first-rounders on offense.

    If Graham leaves, Miller in the first isn't a terrible idea (although, as others have said before, Brian Leonard is an even more obvious fit for the Pats).
  19. stinkypete

    stinkypete Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 15, 2004
    Messages:
    2,245
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I actually like Carriker to San Fran. They seriously need to build up their defensive line, and Carriker could play in both a 4-3 or a 3-4.
  20. Keegs

    Keegs Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 11, 2006
    Messages:
    4,924
    Likes Received:
    7
    Ratings:
    +7 / 0 / -0

    haha ok creep.
  21. Digger44

    Digger44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I guess I do not understand the Miller pick because Greg Olsen out of Miami is a much better player IMO. At the college all pro competition he was clearly the best receiver by far. He has as good of hands any anybody in the draft. IMO he is the complete package. I would be thrilled to get him @ #28.
  22. zippo59

    zippo59 Rookie

    Joined:
    Apr 7, 2006
    Messages:
    5,072
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    It seemed in the explanation Miller's appeal was that he was a very good blocker (like Graham.)
  23. Digger44

    Digger44 Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 30, 2005
    Messages:
    1,962
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    I know, but we have good blockers. Watson is improving, Mills is a FB, and Thomas is a good blocker. I would not mind seeing Watson's receiving time reduced, blocking time increased, so Olsen and Thomas can showcase what they have. Instead of featuring Watson, share the love and become diverse.
  24. upstater1

    upstater1 Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,926
    Likes Received:
    9
    Ratings:
    +9 / 0 / -0

    I don't know why we're arguing about this mock draft and TEs since this is clearly a bad mock. Micahel Bush isn't going in the first round, and the last thing the Bills need is a possession wide receiver. That's the only position that team is stocked well at. Bad mock. Case closed.

    Secondly, will Patriots fans stop calling the Patriots "Patsies?" Look up the word in the dictionary. It's no different than a Jet's fan calling his team the Jests.
  25. JoeSixPat

    JoeSixPat Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2004
    Messages:
    9,800
    Likes Received:
    21
    Ratings:
    +24 / 0 / -0

    Seems to me that all mock drafts are pretty irrelevant in February.

    Come April you'll see guys from the 3rd Round in February Mocks in the 1st round, and 1st round February mocks in the 3rd.

    The combine changes a lot, as does the rumor mill once word begins to leak about who is really getting a lot of interest.
  26. captain stone

    captain stone Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    8,341
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0

    These are true words you speak, beginning with picks in the 20s.

    For me, Paul Posluszny is the guy to watch at the combine/workouts. Will he be big enough, strong enough, and explosive enough?
  27. satz

    satz Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2006
    Messages:
    1,919
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Guess non have you been looking at watson being blown up in blocks for a Sack.I am always amazed during the game week people are pissed he cannot block and in the offseason are ready to give him more blocking assignments.
  28. pats60

    pats60 Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    408
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think Thomas was the most under used player on the team
    His game against Jax 5 catches 83 yards should how good
    he could be. His diving td catch i believe was the best catch of the year.
  29. frankiesfly

    frankiesfly Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 19, 2006
    Messages:
    1,357
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    With Watson, Graham, and Thomas, if the Pats draft another TE ill die. Unless thats signs that where getting rid of Graham.
  30. tedylb

    tedylb Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 25, 2005
    Messages:
    569
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +3 / 0 / -0

    \

    Exactly. It's fun to speculate, but all mock drafts are crapshoots. Is there anyone on the planet (outside of the coaches and Pioli) who had Mankins and Maroney as our last two #1's?

Share This Page