MetalBleachers
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Jun 9, 2007
- Messages
- 1,280
- Reaction score
- 0
I love the thought of the devious Cards and master planner Whisenhunt setting up the Pats for a fall. If the coach risks the health of his best receiver to prove that he can play in nasty weather, and that receiver (or anyone else) gets hurt, then he looks like an idiot. I bet he uses the first half of this game as a tune-up, then - depending on how the team looks - rests many of his guys. He can use Week 17's matchup with Seattle at Arizona to build up some momentum.
Say what you want about resting your starters, but had the Pats been 14-1 going into the final game last year, I don't believe they would have played everyone for four quarters. Unlike the Giants, the Cards have little to prove. A clinch is a clinch.
We shall see.
Say what you want about resting your starters, but had the Pats been 14-1 going into the final game last year, I don't believe they would have played everyone for four quarters. Unlike the Giants, the Cards have little to prove. A clinch is a clinch.
We shall see.