SONS_OF_BELICHICK
Third String But Playing on Special Teams
- Joined
- Nov 3, 2010
- Messages
- 858
- Reaction score
- 188
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Again, you don't know what the word hypocrite means. How many times are you planning to use it incorrectly and look like an idiot before you drop this line of discussion?
You really are pathetic at trolling. You've been reduced to defending yourself about a word you clearly don't understand.
FORUM = an assembly, meeting place, television program, etc., for the discussion of questions of public interest.
I guess the next time ...I should'nt use confident....it only leads to visitors providing less valued conversation.... :bricks:
Actually, you're not succeeding in the trash talk department either. All you've done is complain about a handful of Patriots fans and called them ****y. If that's your definition of successful smack talk then tying your own shoes must be a daily accomplishment.The only ones doing that are you guys...
I told you what I'm here for. I'm here to talk smack because I saw this thread. You guys are the ones crying about it. I probably wont even be here tomorrow so don't flatter yourself.
WoW. Is there something in the water in NE? I suggest you read again.
I've read your posts. You just don't know the language. Again, that's not our fault.
Perhaps if you teach BradyRocksMySox the meaning of "straw man" and how to use it, he'll teach you the meaning of "hypocrite" and how to use it. It's got to be embarrassing to the other Bolts fans who are stuck watching you two butcher the language the way you've been doing it.
I've read your posts. You just don't know the language. Again, that's not our fault.
Perhaps if you teach BradyRocksMySox the meaning of "straw man" and how to use it, he'll teach you the meaning of "hypocrite" and how to use it. It's got to be embarrassing to the other Bolts fans who are stuck watching you two butcher the language the way you've been doing it.
Actually, you're not succeeding in the trash talk department either. All you've done is complain about a handful of Patriots fans and called them ****y. If that's your definition of successful smack talk then tying your own shoes must be a daily accomplishment.
Then again, you're probably Norv Turner and picking up a first down is a massive accomplishment celebrated with trophies and Gatorade baths.
Let me break it down for you. PatsDeb was being a hypocrite because every team has fans that go to other teams boards and talk smack, including yours. Yet PatsDeb expects it to not happen here on the Pats board. So.. while PatsDeb was not personally over there talking smack when you lump the Pats fan base together as 1, that is a hypocritical statement.
english lesson/
You're probably right, Norv doesn't have any meaningful trophies as a Head Coach.You're pretty bad at the Norv digs...
By the way, can anyone provide insight towards their backup Center? Honestly curious here about your opinions.
But since I was not over there doing what I call ludicrous (and I don't know why any intelligent Pats fan would do it either), I am not a hypocrite. Reality lesson. As lots of people have invited you to do, why don't you say something intelligent about your team? I'm starting to think you don't know anything about the Chargers.
Can I say something intelligent about my team? :bricks:
You're probably right, Norv doesn't have any meaningful trophies as a Head Coach.
Connolly didn't miss a beat on the weekend. We'll have to wait and see who comes out in the formation before delving further into that.
Another straw man argument. Fact is, the Chargers gave the Pats the ball 4 times, handed it to them! That should have predicated the outcome, and yet the Chargers lost because of that missed field goal. That's a testament to the Chargers' defense.
Anywho, should be a fun, nail-biting game.
Why does this have to revert back to Jet fans? Not all of us are incompetent homers. If you check out some of the boards, you'll see how much respect Belichick is getting on his documentary.
Why does this have to revert back to Jet fans? Not all of us are incompetent homers. If you check out some of the boards, you'll see how much respect Belichick is getting on his documentary.
:rocker:I don't care that he doesn't, his beautiful elephant neck makes up for it.
I'll be interested to see how the Bolts contain Gronkowski and Hernandez given the obvious mismatches they create running past the linebackers and into the secondary. Weedle's the one the Pats need to nullify. That goes without saying.It goes without saying, this'll be an interesting test for both teams. Specifically, I'm curious to see just how good our Secondary has been trumpeted to be. In theory, it's several times better than last seasons', and some could argue the holding of McNabb to 39 yards is telling of that (yet I don't buy it).
I'm not sure game 2 is a meaningful projection into the future given most NFL defenses appeared to struggle in week 1. The Chargers did give up 6.1YPC to Peterson and I'd hazard a thought that the Patriots O/L is considerably better than Minnesota's (putting aside the calibre of RB). Woodhead and Green-Ellis could be in for handy days if Brady starts off hot again.The other test is also to see how well we can pass rush, and get a taste for Manusky's forte. You should at least be slightly apprehensive towards our defense, because this is the best we've been since 2006, defensively. That's in theory and on paper, but it was indicative in our first game. That's why I say, this game will prove or discredit many things.
The Pats TE's are going to be problems for everyone this season. I'll be interested to see if the Chargers game plan in the attempt to nullify those two with the safeties and what that opens up for the receivers.Apparently the defensive plan is to go heavy on the nickel, and I'm not sure about the Dante Hughes on Wes Welker matchup. Looks dangerous. Your TEs will be the tough part, so I'm intrigued to see how our defensive scheme turns out.
Gates and Jackson pose the biggest threats for mine. If Guyton's covering Gates without safety help, he's in for a huge day. Dowling was reasonably impressive in his rookie start. He's got some nice size about him that should help him compete against either Floyd or Jackson. McCourty's been a little off to begin the year, but he does have the ability to clamp down on receivers and force turnovers.How will you take care of our WRs and Gates and our two RBs who are mighty effective with sweeps and screens?