SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.For someone who hasn't followed this story. Why is everyone so high on this guy?
I understand he has a solid year in the CFL and he had heart problems caused from medication overdose by the college doctor.
Was there a solid contingent on this board after him in a previous draft? Sorry if this sounds stupid but i have just never heard of him before. I know he played 3 seasons at USC but thats about it.
Was he projected to be a 1st/2nd round pick?
Video of Armstead's pro day:
Video: Armond Armstead NFL Pro Day / 6'5" 290llbs DT/DE ~ Frequency
I thought he might be like Fletcher Cox but his numbers don't really correspond. Cox is faster and more agile whilst Armstead has more lower body power. Armstead's results:
5.01 40
7.48 3-cone
30" Vert
9'10" Broad
Tony Pauline says he "later looked very athletic in position drills:
2012 NFL draft pro day updates - Tony Pauline - SI.com
FWIW, the Pats were in attendance at his pro-day and he had a visit with us that year.
I tried to find athletic comparisons with similar sized DT's using combine data. He's slightly less athletic than Derek Wolfe, worse than Cameron Jordan and Adrian Clayborn and obviously much much worse than JJ Watt. Probably the best comparison I can find is Jared Odrick, their numbers match up really well although Odrick has a slightly better 3-cone. Based upon his similar numbers to Wolfe and Odrick, based purely upon size and athleticism, we're looking at a 5-8 sacks a season guy.
For someone who hasn't followed this story. Why is everyone so high on this guy?
Video of Armstead's pro day:
Video: Armond Armstead NFL Pro Day / 6'5" 290llbs DT/DE ~ Frequency
I thought he might be like Fletcher Cox but his numbers don't really correspond. Cox is faster and more agile whilst Armstead has more lower body power. Armstead's results:
5.01 40
7.48 3-cone
30" Vert
9'10" Broad
Tony Pauline says he "later looked very athletic in position drills:
2012 NFL draft pro day updates - Tony Pauline - SI.com
FWIW, the Pats were in attendance at his pro-day and he had a visit with us that year.
I tried to find athletic comparisons with similar sized DT's using combine data. He's slightly less athletic than Derek Wolfe, worse than Cameron Jordan and Adrian Clayborn and obviously much much worse than JJ Watt. Probably the best comparison I can find is Jared Odrick, their numbers match up really well although Odrick has a slightly better 3-cone. Based upon his similar numbers to Wolfe and Odrick, based purely upon size and athleticism, we're looking at a 5-8 sacks a season guy.
This is potentially tremendous news. If the kid can be what his potential indicates, this team just got much stronger on the line while keeping draft picks in position to address the other significant issues.
Armstead
Re-sign Welker
Re-sign Talib or find a suitable replacement
S - round 1 or round 2 trade up
WR - round 1 or round 2 trade up
OL
healthy return of Ballard
That'd be a hell of a promising start to the offseason, IMO, particularly if it's accompanied by the re-signing of Edelman to serve as a Swiss Army Knife sort of player and the re-signing of Woodhead to serve as Woodhead. Do that, and find a way to fleece the Chiefs out of Poe, and I'll need to visit my doctor about a "more than 4 hours" issue.
One addition to that list:
Dwayne Bowe comes here as a free agent because of Brian Daboll (Lloyd-McDaniels situation, but it may cost us more).
The guy has improved every year, in 2012 has 8 sacks, 5 forced fumbles and you want to make him a part-time player. Really?
2-3 more sacks and he is a DPOY candidate.
Jones is NOT a 3-4 DE, in a 3-4 he would either be off the field or at OLB.
I resided in the anti-Bowe camp but no longer.
Hes 28. Been productive. To your point, hes been in the Weis offense and has been productive. Only question is some of the character stuff and dumb things hes said in the past.
To me it's a choice.....Welker or Bowe. You can't have both.
If Armstead was so highly regarded, why didn't an NFL team sign him out of college at least as a UFA? I don't get it. Is it only because of his CFL play that he's now considered a good prospect?
Great big play player, but sorry, he doesn't set the edge.
Will truly excel as a 3rd down player and not hurt the team with RB's who go outside.
Just rewatch where Rice and Pierce killed us on Sunday.
Again, I would like to point out how OTAs haven't started yet, the draft is 3 months out, and Training Camp even more so. Things can and will change as it relates to plans.
Armstead has potential, yes. But what about the last guy we hyped up (Markell Carter) and look where he ended up. Armstead could be a great NFL player, he could be a total bust signing. We have to see how he is with the team first and see if he even makes the 53 before declaring the return of the 3-4 Defense.
To that last point, I don't see a return to the 3-4. Bill VALUES consistency. Why would he switch to a 4-3 two years ago, and then switch back to a 3-4 after drafting and acquiring 4-3 personnel all because Armstead can play the 5-tech?
Let's avoid the hype and therefore avoid the potential for letdown.
Video of Armstead's pro day:
Video: Armond Armstead NFL Pro Day / 6'5" 290llbs DT/DE ~ Frequency
I thought he might be like Fletcher Cox but his numbers don't really correspond. Cox is faster and more agile whilst Armstead has more lower body power. Armstead's results:
5.01 40
7.48 3-cone
30" Vert
9'10" BroadWith that kind of speed he could play LB here....