- Joined
- Apr 23, 2008
- Messages
- 17,872
- Reaction score
- 8,916
I got told when I thought the Patriots may finish 10-6 this season that was ridiculous too.7-9/8-8 is the dumbest thing I've heard. Absolutely ridiculous.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I got told when I thought the Patriots may finish 10-6 this season that was ridiculous too.7-9/8-8 is the dumbest thing I've heard. Absolutely ridiculous.
The Jets should win the East next year...and easily with that loaded roster
If not for a Clayton dropped pass and a Mccelvin fumble, we are an 8-8 team this year---and that was with a 100% healthy Welker and Wilfork. So yeah if the Pats remain passive by ignoring FA and just keep trading down in the draft to acquire value , I can see 7-9/8-8
I got told when I thought the Patriots may finish 10-6 this season that was ridiculous too.
You get rid of the underachievers (Burgess, Green) and malcontents (Adalius Thomas). Just look at the players salary cap charge for the 2009 season and compare that to their production. Meanwhile, new leaders need to emerge on defense (Wilfork, Warren, Mayo, Sanders?) while the defense is in transition.Where is the bottom, and do we need to tear things apart even more to eventually rise back up? Is that model even relevant?
You get rid of the underachievers (Burgess, Green) and malcontents (Adalius Thomas). Just look at the players salary cap charge for the 2009 season and compare that to their production. Meanwhile, new leaders need to emerge on defense (Wilfork, Warren, Mayo, Sanders?) while the defense is in transition.
If not for a Clayton dropped pass and a Mccelvin fumble, we are an 8-8 team this year---and that was with a 100% healthy Welker and Wilfork. So yeah if the Pats remain passive by ignoring FA and just keep trading down in the draft to acquire value , I can see 7-9/8-8