- Joined
- Dec 13, 2009
- Messages
- 166
- Reaction score
- 76
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I have a question.
Every player contract have 2 parts. Guaranteed money and non-guaranteed money.
What happened with the non-guaranteed money, which will not be paid, due the lack of performance or injury.
Is this owners profit? Have this money any influence on future caps?
It becomes available for use on other players, and teams can carry over unused cap space from one year into the next.
Some owners are notorious for spending as little as the NFL requires, while some (e.g., the Patriots) use the vast majority of cap dollars they are allotted. So, for example, the $1 million or so the Pats got from Kelly, Anderson, and Smith will go to fund other contracts (whether the practice squad, an extension for Devin McCourty, etc.).
Which owners are notorious for spending as little as they can?
I want to say the Chiefs off the top of my head. In any case, the NFL now requires a certain minimum amount of spending.
It becomes available for use on other players, and teams can carry over unused cap space from one year into the next.
Really? I know, last year, with all of the replacements of the injuries, we have a capspace near by 6millions.
If i look at http://overthecap.com/salary-cap/new-england-patriots/ we have finally, after all, in 2013 a capspace of 16 millions.
Now in 2014 we have a cap of 139 millions( base is 133). There is a whole of 10millions?
I want to say the Chiefs off the top of my head. In any case, the NFL now requires a certain minimum amount of spending.
I think that's enforced as a league average spending, and not on any one team?