PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Cap Rules Question - Anderson and Jackson


mgteich

PatsFans.com Veteran
PatsFans.com Supporter
Joined
Sep 13, 2004
Messages
37,645
Reaction score
16,425
Are we allowed to cut an injured players or one with a non-football injury.

If so, what is the contractual and cap consequence?

If we cannot cut the player, do we still owe him his bonus if he is on IR or NFL?
==========

Jackson is due a bonus on Day 3 of the new contract year.
 
Jackson isn’t getting another cent. They actually stopped paying him the instant he went on NFI, perhaps a hint that they didn’t believe his agent’s mental illness claim told the whole story.

Anderson has $1.23M “fully guaranteed,” which is misleading because that only means guaranteed for cap, skill, and (football) injury. The team can most likely release him without paying those guarantees if he’s still limited by his illness. They could also just pay that money out of good will, given that it’s basically irrelevant in the big picture and that Anderson made every attempt to contribute sandwiched between his two instances of illness that required hospitalization.

Non-football illness is pretty rare, so I’m not aware of examples of it voiding guaranteed money. It happens more often with non-football injuries, though. Nyheim Hines was injured in a jet ski accident last offseason, and the Bills not only withheld his salary but also pursued recouping his signing bonus. Ju’Wuan James tore his Achilles while working out on his own in 2021, and the Broncos voided his $15M guarantees by successfully arguing that his guarantees didn’t cover injuries while working out on his own during the offseason, only if it’s in the team facility.


In the case of actual football injuries, a player is entitled to their salary for the duration of the season or that injury (whichever is shorter), any future injury guarantees, and up to $2.1M from the injury protection benefit. The injury protection benefit applies to players with 4 years of experience who suffered serious injuries that will keep them out into the beginning of the following season, who were under contract but were released. In that case, the team has to pay their salary (up to the max of $2.1M) the following season despite releasing them. That will likely come into play for Nick Chubb, who the Browns can’t possibly keep on the roster at his salary after that serious of an injury. But he’ll get $2.1M.
 
Last edited:
I am pretty sure you can cut a player with a NFI without having to pay them. The team is only responsible to pay players who they cut when the injury happens on the game or practice field. The team cannot be responsible for injuries or illnesses that are not in the team's control.

If you could get your entire salary if you were cut with a mental illness, every player with an extremely large base salary who are likely to get cut and unlikely to get that money elsewhere would find a doctor to say that they have a mental illness that is so bad they cannot play.
 
Ju’Wuan James tore his Achilles while working out on his own in 2021, and the Broncos voided his $15M guarantees by successfully arguing that his guarantees didn’t cover injuries while working out on his own during the offseason, only if it’s in the team facility.
Damn that's cold. Imagine losing 15 mil cause you worked out in the wrong location. I assume he wasn't doing anything reckless. That's rough.
 


It’s Already Maye Day For The Patriots
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots OL Caedan Wallace Press Conference
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf’s Day Two Draft Press Conference
Patriots Take Offensive Lineman Wallace with #68 Overall Pick
TRANSCRIPT: Patriots Receiver Ja’Lynn Polk’s Conference Call
Patriots Grab Their First WR of the 2024 Draft, Snag Washington’s Polk
2024 Patriots Draft Picks – FULL LIST
MORSE: Patriots QB Drake Maye Analysis and What to Expect in Round 2 and 3
Five Patriots/NFL Thoughts Following Night One of the 2024 NFL Draft
Friday Patriots Notebook 4/26: News and Notes
Back
Top