Seattle just a few months ago immediately comes to mind; they did not have anyone ranked among the top 25 in receiving last year. Same holds true for the previous Super Bowl champions, Baltimore. This century there has only been four champions that have had a player rank in the top ten in receiving yards that season; by comparison there have been seven instances where the championship team did not have a top-twenty receiver. Here is a look at the top receiver for each of the last 14 Super Bowl champions, and his rank in receiving yards that season.
2013: 31st (Golden Tate)
2012: 27th (Anquan Boldin)
2011: 3rd (Victor Cruz)
2010: 4th (Greg Jennings)
2009: 18th (Marques Colston)
2008: 15th (Hines Ward)
2007: 21st (Plaxico Burress)
2006: 2nd (Marvin Harrison)
2005: 22nd (Hines Ward)
2004: 32nd (David Givens)
2003: 32nd (Deion Branch)
2002: 16th (Keyshawn Johnson)
2001: 10th (Troy Brown)
2000: 32nd (TE Shannon Sharpe); 56th (WR Qadry Ismail)
Facts don't seem to back up your hypothesis.
I often see or hear this, and I feel that argument is short-sighted. Pro football is the ultimate team game. Even if Brady is 'the best ever' - a very debatable point - his influence is overstated by that comment. Winning a championship takes so very much more than simply having the best player in the game, that makes this argument is nearly irrelevant. It may make sense in a game like basketball, where one single player represents 20% of the team on both offense and defense - but not in football. Being the most important player/position is vastly different from being the sole difference between winning and losing in a game where thirty to forty players on each team can make (or not make) a play that decides the outcome of a game. It takes a whole lot more than having one great player to win a single game, never mind winning 12 games a year and advancing as deep in the playoffs as the Patriots did.
LMAO. Maybe you dont realize it but you proved yourself wrong. Just cuz a wr isn't a league leader doesn't mean he isn't a dangerousrisonmaker. Numbers weren't there due to stuff like missing games but still they were feared playmakers more talented than short slow pipsqueak Nerdy Edelman.
1994-need I say
1995-original playmaker
1996- terry Glenn, rison,freeman
1997-rison,freeman- smith,McCaffrey
1998 smith,McCaffrey
1999 Holt,Bruce
2000- historical great defense still stokley an underrated long 6' slot with 4.44 speed who repeatedly beat a pro bowl corner deep.
2001 us with best qb ever
2002 keyshawn
2003 Brady again, Branch a poor man's Steve smith with underrated separation speed. Got first rounder for him. Who would give a #2 or3 for the wonder twins edelman/amendola combined.
2004- see 2003
2005- shadlers enough said. Great passrusher, Plaxico,very physical wr with quickness in ward and a good healthy the. Seattle great online lacked playmakers. Prime example
2006- colts enough said, Bears great defense lacked playmaker on offense
2007- us,holes on online,defense showing age, moss great but one trick pony,wasn't consistent long intermediate wr,had we had one to. Compliment him we would have had only 19-0 team ever. Or a decent rt who KNOWS THE SCHEME AND WORKS WELL IN IT. Kaczur was a mix of joke/liability. Moss would have been effective. Seller a great but limited slot.
2008- full of playmakers both teams
2009 Playmakers both teams
2010 packers full of respected playmakers. Steelers had them but one trick ponies.
2011. Giants loaded with playmakers, Gronk played injured,we lacked a complete playmaker and it showed. Also lacked passrusher
2012 a hot boldin,Torrey smith,pass catching rb and career year TE. Sf could have used another playmaker.
2013- awesome historical defense and a choking qb. Still hawks had returning Harvin and Tate a physical slot with speed. Still sf almost handed that game. Hawks had a great Defense with terrorizing passrusher,fast hard hitting lbs excelling in coverage. We have a hopeful unproven passrush but has potential.
So point is we're not saying we need a top3 in #'s wr but just a wr with talent,combo of size,speed,athleticism,physicality that can win on 3rd and 10 when defense reads what's coming yet wr's can still win. Like a marquise Lee,Allen robinson,Latimer,Marty Bryant,Jordan Matthews,Paul Richardson, Odell Beckham(athemselvee went very early) etc to develop as our #1 But now if wr's struggle and offense stalls we have to make a trade or it will become apparent we don't have the team to win a championship.
Sf and Seattle have proven dominant defenses, not hopefuls yet both are committed to upgrading at wr. Hawks traded #1 for Harvin and drafted a 6'1 fluid blazing playmaker in rd2 many compare to a young ocho who also weighed 180 til he got to Oregon state. Sf drafted a fast slot and traded for a pretty good proven playmaker.
Fans who try to lie to themselves and want to believe talented wr's are irrelevant and unimportant do so cuz we lack playmaking wr's. And are being bias in opinions. These same fans saying its not important would bust a nu+ if we traded for an Andre Johnson and they know it. They get excited and watch for every UFA we try out,hoping for the slight chance we find that playmaker wr that defenses fear. They say playmaking wr's aren't important yet watch and post every time we try out a wr hoping he could become the guy.
Be honest if we had Julio Jones who would care bout EVERY WR we bring in for a tryout.