belichickaholic
On the Game Day Roster
- Joined
- Jun 30, 2006
- Messages
- 396
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What a hypocrit. The guy idolizes our cheating Aurebach but hates Belichick. Give me a break. How sad that Bill has to deal with this bs.
Bob's right, it was a bad call. The call should have been roughing the passer, Pats ball 15 yards from the spot of the foul. That said, I'll settle for the tuck rule call.
Come on people, it's much better to win a championship by BUYING your way to it.
Sox and Schilling + $200 million dollar payroll, or Celtics and their sham trades for Garnett!
Ryan is intellectually bankrupt on this one.
He's a basketball guy so he should be forgiven, but the league has been over the rule a million times.
So he would rather have senile refs making judgment calls on whether or not "hand going forward = fumble or pass."
There's a valid reason for the rule, Bob....you can't have any gray area for assigning intent of passer.
Its funny how nobody complains about the rule when it happens to their team, but as it applies to the Pats it's suddenly a "bad rule."
He feels the Pats' win in the first Super Bowl was fraudulent because they won on a bad rule.
Um, no they didn't. They may have gotten there with one but they still had to win the big one as massive underdogs. No rule helped them there.
The NBA has a salary cap too...
c'mon...wait just a sec...I've been a Pats fans since the 60's...I would smash Ben Dreith right in the mouth today because HE'S a freakin' azzole..he knows what he did...we NEVER got a damn thing from the league about that 75 playoff.
The Brady tuck situation I thought was a fumble. I never heard of any tuck rule...I saw it, I would have called it a fumble...when it was explained and I read the NFL rule..it was the PROTO tuck rule situation...OK...a stupid rule but THEY put it in..the Raiders STILL had a fair chance and BLEW it...and the Pats, not Brady, beat the bejeezus out of the greatest show on turf...all in all all it added up to one of the greatest football moments in NFL history...if/then was a nice way of dealing with the shock of that Ram offense being shut down in a game they should have scored 50 in. Why there is any question to this day goes to West Coast bias to anything associated with the East.Period. Brady GREW in the second super bowl amd actually unmasked McNabb as a choke in the third. This past one they had won, even though offensively they played horrible. So what? It's always been the Patriots manta these past 8 years that they OUT execute the other team...well the G-Men out executed at the end. End of story. They should have won by double digits but they got a good taste of what the Rams felt in 2001. I think THAT is a good thing for a team with Brady in his prime...and Kevin Garnett,Paul Pierce and Ray Ray using TEAM concepts to do what every bigmouthed media pundit who spent insane amounts of print on the Patriots earlier can only serve as a TREMENDOUS incentive for this 2008 Patriots incarnation. I know you people see it...you see the Sox...you see all the media craziness trying to find holes, trying to tear away at Manny, trying to look for Matsuzaka to falter...and what are they getting?? Lowell(the throwin) is shoving it right down their throats..Pedroia is making them eat tons of bigmouthed crow...think about it...the pressure is OFF the best team in football this season...and I think they are going to dominate in a way that will finally end this whole nationwide jihad waged against them