Easterbrook is too muddled to be right or left. He first made a name for himself, afaik, as an "environmental writer" who would talk about how everything was great with the environment, so we should just all be happy and not push for any environmental legislation. He sort of lurches across the spectrum on various issues, not in any sort of admirable, "look-at-the-issue-and-decide" sort of way, but just with a total lack of actual thought or intellectual integrity. His continuing shtick is to label himself and then argue against the views usually associated with that label. So, he's an "environmentalist" who's against environmental legislation ...
It seems interesting at first until you realize he's dumber than an emoticon with just as much purpose to his bouncing around ...
It seems interesting at first until you realize he's dumber than an emoticon with just as much purpose to his bouncing around ...