patman52
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Sep 26, 2005
- Messages
- 1,271
- Reaction score
- 836
I prefer to use draft value points cause even though i don't believe in them 100% it is a much clearer mathematical indicator of value then just saying "1st" or "2 1st"
I have said before and will say again. 3000 draft value points is my starting spot. I would never go below that and likely would want more to feel comfortable making any deal... Really I'd be looking for 4000.
If a team does not want to pay it I will happily keep him. The last thing i want to do is trade him for less value then that and we let what turns out to be a 10+ year franchise QB go for horrible value.
BTW just for people who don't know here is a draft value chart
Draft Trade Chart | ProFootballTalk
3000 for instance is either the first overall pick (I would look to trade it for multiple first) or 3 #16 overall picks.
Assuming Cleveland get #1 or #2 That could make sense for a partner with potential sweeteners. A team from 3-10 is harder to work out but possible. In the mid rounds IDK who would be there but one of those teams could use a QB I am sure.
You are spot on in referring to value in draft points. I have no where near that value on him. I have him worth around the #10 pick in the draft. He is only signed for one year then the new team will have to pay 5 and 80 at min form him. While a top 5 1st rd pick may not be as ready as Jimmy you have him for 5 years for 1/2 that.
My guess is going to be the Bears for their 2nd this year, the trade comp from Bennett and a 1st next year.