jboston19
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Feb 27, 2014
- Messages
- 2,071
- Reaction score
- 3,583
What's this about a Chef Justice?
Great googly moogly..... we're gonna be a while.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.What's this about a Chef Justice?
Except the problem is that Judge Chin was one of those leftist leaning judges. So they've already swayed one to the dark side in this case....
I didn't realize he meant the Judges on the appeal. I thought he was talking about something else.Great googly moogly..... we're gonna be a while.
Except the problem is that Judge Chin was one of those leftist leaning judges. So they've already swayed one to the dark side in this case....
The suspension has been "off" since Berman's ruling.News: Brady/NFLPA files for 14 day extension to seek en banc review. Says case impacts every player in NFL.
---
So does this mean temporarily the suspension is "off" again? I think Florio said it was an automatic stay when you were seeking the en banc review.
But it still a long shot to get an en banc hearing at the 2nd circuit. Theodore olson should have been brought in earlier. They have to convince 6 other judges for an en banc hearing in a circuit that does not like to touch arbitration results. Just because olson is on board does not mean the court will grant one.
Olsen's bio says he's argued 62 times before the Supreme Court and has won more than 75% of them.
So this means 3 out of 4 cases he argues wins. So, damn.
1) I have argued that this is not the typical partisan situation where republicans tend to support management and democrats tend to support labor. This is deciding the fairness of the arbitration process. It could just as easily been a situation from another industry where management appealed an arbitrator decision based on fundamental unfairness. In fact, IIRC, one of the cases cited in written drafts was precisely that.This is gonna be good. Supreme Court here we come...
I wish this move had been made before the appeal rather than now, but better late than never.
Question for people who are well-versed in this stuff: even if the SC decides to hear this case, what are the odds that the result is anything other than a 4-4 split along purely ideological lines? Seems like it would be a shock for any of Roberts/Alito/Thomas/Kennedy to depart from the anti-labor party line and rule and decide in Brady's favor. Seems like en banc is still the best shot at success, however unlikely it may be.
This assumes, of course, that Clinton wins the presidency and a Republican-dominated senate continues to stonewall any attempt at a SC appointment.