mcmurtry86
Rotational Player and Threatening Starter's Job
- Joined
- Sep 7, 2008
- Messages
- 1,384
- Reaction score
- 1,220
2001 - 13 years ago
2003 - 11 years ago
2004 - a decade ago
2014 - 37yr old QB, No offensive line, no defensive play makers. Maybe there's a little bit of magic left, who knows? But there are ZERO comparisons to be drawn between those teams and this one.
Also, we can't ignore that the 2001 team turned it around by Brady replacing Bledsoe and the 2003 team's biggest opening day flaw (safety) was corrected by putting Eugene Wilson in for Antwan Harris.
The 2014 team's biggest flaws, DT and interior OL, don't have obvious upgrades in the wings. The DT's today were the same pile of suck we saw last year. Vellano still stinks but gets a lot of playing time. Wilfork looked like early 2013 Wilfork (old, handled by single team) than a quality player, Easley was a non-factor and Siliga is a backup caliber player. Who is going to step up? Chris Jones? I doubt it.
The OL might be more promising in that their problems today seemed to stem from a lack of cohesiveness and the mix-and-match personnel changes they had today. That unit might improve over time but I have no faith in the interior DL. The run D and overall stoutness of the interior DL was a problem last year and they did nothing to address it except to add an underweight pass-rushing DT who is clearly still working his way back from a torn ACL.
If Vellano, Siliga, Chris Jones and early-season Wilfork stunk last year vs. the run, why do we expect them to make a leap this year? Maybe they just aren't good players (or, in Wilfork's case, maybe his decline last year pre-injury was real).