- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 3,550
- Reaction score
- 13
Profuse posters proudly produce prodigious punditry.
Laconic, loquacious, layabouts lampoon lazily.
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Profuse posters proudly produce prodigious punditry.
It's the nature of the beast for fans to be reactive, but sometimes I think we do exactly what the media clowns do, trying to be the first to report/predict something regardless of accuracy.
I noted a number of threads about Stallworth turning into "well, Stallworth didn't happen, now what..." laments. One of them even had it in the title.
Whereas every media item I read said he is going to visit Tennessee and Miami, and make a decision.
Could somebody present me a statistic that says a player never visits another team after the one he eventually joins? Or is this just us going nuts on no real information? The whole "If he was gonna sign he would have done a couple days ago" theory seems flawed from that perspective.
Not that I'm sold on Stallworth, Moss, or any other particular receiver as "the answer." I just don't get the hysteria. Can someone explain this point of view?
PFnV
I see NOTHING wrong with Donte Stallworth going to see other teams. He wants to make sure that he gets the right financial package, that he can actually get on with his new team mates and management and that he would want to live in a new area. He may find that he "clicks" better with the coaching staff elsewhere. Who knows?
I agree with you, PFnV, about hysteria. It is worth remembering just what the Internet has done to the world of communication, the speed and the ease with which ideas, news and opinions can be communicated.
Consider that, twenty years ago, I would have subscribed to a newsletter, and sent in comments, if I had something to say. The turnaround time was weeks on that sort of thing. OK, there are Football related magazines and papers that I could have read here in the UK, but there was nothing dedicated specifically to the Pats.
This all adds to the frenzy and the excitement that we all feel. I, like everyone else, get hungry for new information. It is easy to forget that we are still not party to 90 odd percent of what actually happens between closed doors.
I guess my point is that information can more easily be blown out of all proportion. It is easier for us all to read things into what we hear or find out.
The latter being the key word!Laconic, loquacious, layabouts lampoon lazily.
The latter being the key word!
Yeah, well, I don't think anyone would accuse me of being hyperactive.
Okay, I realize I shifted the burden of proof, but does anyone have stats on this, that "in most cases the FA visits, and stops at the team he will play for?" Who in his right mind would be the first visit, if this were true?
I will buy the idea that it is more likely that a guy signs here first than last, for example, since the scenario includes people who've been wooed from point A to point B, and are just showing up to pop the champagne cork.
Seems to me we're going by recent history (4 corkers in a weekend,) rather than any kind of reliable stats.
If we can not substantiate statements like "most of the time," I can't take them seriously... of course by this time Friday (or Saturday or Sunday,) maybe those guys will be proven right (this time.)
PFnV
Clearly, Stallworth is shopping himself for the best deal in the best off-season to be a free agent in the history of the league. Graham did the same thing. He then came back and signed with Denver, his first stop. Another phenomenon being observed is that to many free agents this year, the best deal is not necessarily the most lucrative. Its gotten to the point where they have the luxury of saying "as long as the up front money is there, I will play for the team that fits my goals the best". Which is going to bode well for a team like the Pats.
I dont see the need for a stretch the field WR if CJ is coming back for camp. But perhaps BB knows something about that whole situation that we dont know. So I too will drink the kool aid (strawberry, please) and in BB I trust.
Oh nice! Now I have this mental image of Onslo from the old Keeping Up Appearances show. Poor MsG-cat.Yeah, well, I don't think anyone would accuse me of being hyperactive.
I think the "stretch the field" concept is valid but a little overstated. It adds a dimension, and keeps DBs honest, but the same can be said of the spread attack in general -- too many targets for the coverage guys, period. The difference is that getting burned for the long gainer can leave you no room to make up the bad play. But the spread attack, with or without the long gainer, puts plenty of points on the board (even in this last season with the revolving door at receiver.)
I guess I would call that big-play threat a "wanna-have" not a "gotta-have." If BB/SP share this opinion, the Stallworths and Mosses of the world need to recognize that is the case, if indeed they put any premium on being part of this franchise. This plays into "what you're worth to this team," rather than what you're worth as some sort of dimensionless number at which you value yourself.
If it's competition between us and other teams, what NE brings to the table includes that very mindset, because that's the mindset that wins SBs, and people know it. If star receivers don't catch on -- no pun intended -- it's been the pattern in NE to succeed with what receivers are available.
Still and all, it would be nice to see this capability added. Drinkin another kool-aid my ownself,
PFnV