PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Will Amendola be the only move we make at WR?


Status
Not open for further replies.

NG Pats Fan

Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
Joined
Sep 22, 2009
Messages
6,420
Reaction score
7,106
In my opinion until proven otherwise, Amendola is nothing but an injury prone rams castoff, not a dangerous starting NFL caliber WR. I sure hope the patriots have a plan up their sleeve, maybe go after a real NFL wide receiver like jennings or cruz?
 
The direct answer is that we will definitely sign more wide receivers. It is unlikely that we would sign Jennings, but he is certainly worth the effort. I don't think that we will move on Cruz. He's just not worth a first plus top money.

The main question is whether we are picking up Lloyd's option.
 
If you judge the team by the past,you can expect an older lower to mid 30s WR to join the team after the major players have left the market and I would think they will look for a deep threat in the second round of the draft and resign Edelman.
 
The direct answer is that we will definitely sign more wide receivers. It is unlikely that we would sign Jennings, but he is certainly worth the effort. I don't think that we will move on Cruz. He's just not worth a first plus top money.

The main question is whether we are picking up Lloyd's option.

It feels like they won't pick up Lloyd's option, which should free up a few million dollars. Add that to the $2.5 million from Fanene, and suddenly they have another 5-6 million dollars available to get a WR. Of course, by letting Lloyd go, they'd have another WR spot to fill.
 
If you judge the team by the past,you can expect an older lower to mid 30s WR to join the team after the major players have left the market and I would think they will look for a deep threat in the second round of the draft and resign Edelman.

That is what I basically expect.

Sign a number of cheap veteran WRs and add someone from the draft and maybe Edelman.
 
That is what I basically expect.

Sign a number of cheap veteran WRs and add someone from the draft and maybe Edelman.

I think Edelman is a lock,there is probably no market at all for him and the Pats have been a perfect fit for his talents.....its a lasting marriage that should come cheap.
 
I sure hope not he's alot slower than Welker *straight line speed* which not a ringing endorsement. We have not ADDRESSED the SPEED WR NEED. I wanted Mike Wallace.:mad:
 
I'm very intrigued to see what the team will do with Lloyd. Regardless what happens to him, I'm pretty sure they will also look towards the draft for more wideouts.
 
I would think that Jennings can pick among Minnesota, GB and New England. After that, it will be difficult to find a WR who projects to as much production as Lloyd gives us.

It feels like they won't pick up Lloyd's option, which should free up a few million dollars. Add that to the $2.5 million from Fanene, and suddenly they have another 5-6 million dollars available to get a WR. Of course, by letting Lloyd go, they'd have another WR spot to fill.
 
I expect them to release Lloyd, sign Edelman, sign one other low-level FA (I was thinking DHB, but it might be Donald Jones), and then draft a first round (or trade back to high second) WR.


Although I will say that a Mallett+picks for Fitzgerald trade has been mentioned a lot more than I expected. Still a very long shot, but the fact that it's even being mentioned says something.
 
You want Edelman, Amendola, draftee, low-level free agent and Slater as our wide receivers? That's plain awful.

I expect them to release Lloyd, sign Edelman, sign one other low-level FA (I was thinking DHB, but it might be Donald Jones), and then draft a first round (or trade back to high second) WR.


Although I will say that a Mallett+picks for Fitzgerald trade has been mentioned a lot more than I expected. Still a very long shot, but the fact that it's even being mentioned says something.
 
I expect them to release Lloyd, sign Edelman, sign one other low-level FA (I was thinking DHB, but it might be Donald Jones), and then draft a first round (or trade back to high second) WR.


Although I will say that a Mallett+picks for Fitzgerald trade has been mentioned a lot more than I expected. Still a very long shot, but the fact that it's even being mentioned says something.

I mean, what kind of picks would NE have to give up for Fitz? 1st and 2nd rounders, almost for sure. But holy cow, a set of Gronk, Hernandez, Amendola, and Fitzgerald would be otherworldly.

But no way is that deal going to happen (I don't think).
 
You want Edelman, Amendola, draftee, low-level free agent and Slater as our wide receivers? That's plain awful.
The Pats aren't going to be as top-heavy at WR as they were last season. That's pretty inevitable. I think the bigger issue is making sure they can do better than Branch as the #4 who becomes the #3 with an injury.
 
I mean, what kind of picks would NE have to give up for Fitz? 1st and 2nd rounders, almost for sure. But holy cow, a set of Gronk, Hernandez, Amendola, and Fitzgerald would be otherworldly.

But no way is that deal going to happen (I don't think).
Scratch that idea, I guess. Bedard was one who wrote something along the lines of "it's not likely, but there's a chance," and he was then told by someone that there is no chance.
 
I doubt that this will be the last move. They'll bring in at least 1 more, 2+ if Branch is gone (as he should be), and 3+ if Lloyd is gone.

Most of all, the Pats need someone who can beat single coverage outside the numbers. If that's not Lloyd, then they'll have to find someone else who can do it.
 
Your proposal would give us the weakest WR's (and the cheapest) among likely playoff teams.

The Pats aren't going to be as top-heavy at WR as they were last season. That's pretty inevitable. I think the bigger issue is making sure they can do better than Branch as the #4 who becomes the #3 with an injury.
 
Your proposal would give us the weakest WR's (and the cheapest) among likely playoff teams.
And nowhere near the weakest overall receiving corps. I don't see the problem. Belichick's plan seems pretty clear. It's about complimenting the TEs rather than getting as much production as possible even if it's redundant.
 
I could see the pats chasing down donald jones and maybe someone like hixon

then see what happens in the draft.

also, with ballard here, I'd expect to see hernandez spend more time as something other than TE.
 
This team went into FA needing a stretch receiver.
Instead it downgraded the slot so now neither spots are solid.

The team needs to sign a stretch receiver before it resigns Edelman.
 
I expect them to draft someone who can work the outside, this draft is supposedly deep with WR. Eventually they are just going to have to hit on one who can contribute solidly if they want to stop playing these cat-and-mouse games with FA receivers. People seem to automatically discount the idea that the Pats could actually draft a WR who can contribute (or even get on the field) in his rookie year.

I'm not expecting it, just saying that they have to hit one time to alleviate some of the pain at this position. One time, dealer!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.


Monday Patriots Notebook 5/6: News and Notes
Tom Brady Sustains, Dishes Some Big Hits on Netflix Roast Special
TRANSCRIPT: Jerod Mayo on the Rich Eisen Show From 5/2/24
Patriots News And Notes 5-5, Early 53-Man Roster Projection
New Patriots WR Javon Baker: ‘You ain’t gonna outwork me’
Friday Patriots Notebook 5/3: News and Notes
Thursday Patriots Notebook 5/2: News and Notes
Wednesday Patriots Notebook 5/1: News and Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Jerod Mayo’s Appearance on WEEI On Monday
Tuesday Patriots Notebook 4/30: News and Notes
Back
Top