patfaninpittsburgh is having trouble understanding this continual display of clueless.
You seem hell bent on re-reverse contradicting yourself.
Let's recap.
An article is posted on an individual's opinion of the NFL "receiving corps".
The author defines "receiving corps" as WR's/TE's.
The author ranks New Orleans second but acknowledges the importance of Sproles but doesn't include him in the rankings because RB's are part of the author's "receiving corps" criteria.
Numbnuts naturally hiijacks the thread whining about RB's being excluded.
Had the author included RB's...the same "contrarian" would have hiijacked the thread complaing RB's should be excluded.
You have both whined about RB's being excluded and are whining to patsfaninpittsburgh that RB's are included.
Reread the bold paragraph to understand the concept of the article.
Amazing that someone could directly contradict themselves and be even more wrong.
BTW, did it ever occurr to you that utilizing a RB likes Sproles is essential because the author defined "receiving corps" isn't as good?
Bottom line: You have no argument to those that say RBs should be included in the discussion so you throw a tantrum claiming that the subject is off topic. The reality is that it is very much on topic because the point questions the thoroughness and completeness of the authors analysis. If you disagree, go find a mod and ask them to intervene. Otherwise, stop acting childish attacking other forum members and try to put forth a cogent argument as to why RBs shouldn't be included in the definition of Receiving Corps when they traditionally have.