- Joined
- Oct 10, 2006
- Messages
- 76,883
- Reaction score
- 66,866
The argument about Rodgers has NOTHING to do with Michael Vick.
You portraying that it does is completely ridiculous.
Equating an argument over QB quality by lumping in Vick and Rodgers (your words not mine, "same argument") is delusional.
Given that my "argument" was a statement noting that people bought into the same hype last year "QB playing better than Brady", why do you continue pretending that I'm trying to equate specific arguments about Rodgers with specific arguments about Vick?