Trey
On the Roster
- Joined
- Oct 5, 2010
- Messages
- 77
- Reaction score
- 0
I'd add the Raiders to that.
I could buy that this season, but I was basing it on last year. That's why I had the disclaimer in there.
Something not being 100% due to one factor does not make that factor irrelevant.
True. It would take much more consideration than what I presented to disregard it completely. But it's enough to knock it down from bullet point status, because it's not logically sound enough to stand on its own as an argument. It's much cleaner to look at the players positionally (and scrutinize them, thus) and how they excel at their job than to try to produce covers and broad statistics that may or may not be indicative of their respective playing level.
Last edited: