Simkin
Banned
- Joined
- Oct 11, 2009
- Messages
- 1,103
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Did you miss Big Sey's contract? ADs? Wilforks? Bradys league leading contract?
Amazing how perception ignores contradictory facts.
This is a business, not fantasy football.
Did you miss Big Sey's contract? ADs? Wilforks? Bradys league leading contract?
Amazing how perception ignores contradictory facts.
This is a business, not fantasy football.
This is getting crazy, Vincent Jackson and Larry Fitzgerald. We just gave up a stud WR for a measely 3rd rounder now you guys want to go out and give up what will be a king's ransom for another. It's like trading Maroney and wanting to get Tashard Choice or some other 3rd string RB... counter productive at best. We've chosen a direction let's stick to it.
Doug Gabriel is available, right?
3. A good WR on a bad team that, at this point, might prefer a couple of draft picks instead of a top-flight, and expensive, WR. Such as: Lee Evans (Buf) or Steve Smith (Car). Don't know if these guys are available, but either one would be helpful to the Pats, for sure.
You mean, other than the huge contracts he just gave out (Brady, Wilfork), and the huge ones hes given out the last 5 years (Thomas, Moss, etc)
Although, I am not betting the Pats acquire anyone. Moss is 33. Jackson and Fitzgerald are both 27. You are talking two players who will be studs for the next five or six years vs. a 33 year old player who hasn't played like a stud since November of last year. You analogy of Maroney and Choice isn't accurate because Moss is not the future of the Pats while adding either Jackson or Fitzgerald would definitely be the future (eventhough I see a trade unlikely).
Moss hasn't done much this year. He would not do much past this year for the Pats since he was unlikely to resign. Jackson or Fitzgerald could do what Moss did from 2007 through the midway point of last year for the next five years for the Pats (at close to it).
AD's the only one. Seymour is in Oakland after the first year that he wasnt a all pro .
Given the Pats past behavior w/r/t recievers, does anyone seriously expect to them to trade draft picks for a decent one now?
The fact that hes gone now doesn't change the fact that they gave him the biggest contract in the NFL for a guy at his position.
Brady, Colvin, Wilfork, Warren, etc, all recieved big deals.