eom
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Nov 13, 2007
- Messages
- 4,064
- Reaction score
- 1,487
Comp picks are only awarded if a team loses more eligible FAs than it signs--there is no guarantee that the Raiders will get compensated if they lose Burgess (and probably wouldn't since they are a lower-tier team talentwise). A bird in the hand is worth a lot more than one in the bush, in this case.
On the flip side, it is highly likely that the Patriots will be losing more eligible FAs than they sign in 2010, meaning that they'd probably get a comp pick back from Burgess (if he weren't to extend). This may make the one-year rental option more palatable to the Patriots.
that's some good thinking --- thx for the info.
that talk of a second rounder seems way high, and I liked the deal better when I thought he was only 2m, but he could be a good addition even if it's just on 3rd and long, as that seems to be what everybody's worried about.
3.5m and a 2nd/3rd seems pretty steep for a 3rd and long guy, though.