- Joined
- Apr 28, 2008
- Messages
- 3,020
- Reaction score
- 939
I would think if we trade #23 we will either trade it for a
(1)2010 First Round Selection OR,
(2)To move back in the draft to around 40ish
If scenario 2 occurred, the draft value chart says #23 = 760pts....#40=500 and #72 = 230 points (that teams 3rd round selection)...#136 (38pts) we would have for example
34, 40, 47, 58, 72, 89, 97 (untradeable), 124, 136, 170 (untradeable), 199, 207 (untradeable), and 234 (13 picks)
Here, it'd be fun because you know we would have to trade a bunch of picks. What I would do is try to trade another few picks to get into the 2nd round for the 5th time
Example
Trade 72 and 89 and the value chart gets you all the way up to 53. Add 124 and 136 and that gets you all the way to 44. Obviously you need a team willing to trade, probably one that is short on Picks. Washington wouldve been great had they had a 2nd rounder.
This would give up 34, 40, 44, 47, 58, 97, 170, 199, 207, 234 (10 picks)
We'd probably still have to trade some picks
(1)2010 First Round Selection OR,
(2)To move back in the draft to around 40ish
If scenario 2 occurred, the draft value chart says #23 = 760pts....#40=500 and #72 = 230 points (that teams 3rd round selection)...#136 (38pts) we would have for example
34, 40, 47, 58, 72, 89, 97 (untradeable), 124, 136, 170 (untradeable), 199, 207 (untradeable), and 234 (13 picks)
Here, it'd be fun because you know we would have to trade a bunch of picks. What I would do is try to trade another few picks to get into the 2nd round for the 5th time
Example
Trade 72 and 89 and the value chart gets you all the way up to 53. Add 124 and 136 and that gets you all the way to 44. Obviously you need a team willing to trade, probably one that is short on Picks. Washington wouldve been great had they had a 2nd rounder.
This would give up 34, 40, 44, 47, 58, 97, 170, 199, 207, 234 (10 picks)
We'd probably still have to trade some picks