SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Because that would be too rational.It seems like so many people are saying that the Pats are washed up or trying to explain why maybe there's a chnce they're not done. Am I crazy or have they only lost one game? Why is everyone going so nuts here? Why don't we wait until they're 2-6 or 5-1 or 6-5 before we and the media start determining if the Pats are terrible, in big trouble, or still good.
It seems like so many people are saying that the Pats are washed up or trying to explain why maybe there's a chnce they're not done. Am I crazy or have they only lost one game? Why is everyone going so nuts here? Why don't we wait until they're 2-6 or 5-1 or 6-5 before we and the media start determining if the Pats are terrible, in big trouble, or still good.
The first and most important of the "accentuate the positive" points is the run blocking performance by the Patriots offensive line so far this year
i read that statement in the article, and i could swear the writer made a mistake....
but somehow he has stats to back that up....so my question is...what the hell happened against Miami when the runing game was horrendus while the line blocked well
I'm assuming his metrics end the second the runner breaks the line of scrimmage and gets stomped into the astro.
If the season ended today we'd be in the playoffs,It seems like so many people are saying that the Pats are washed up or trying to explain why maybe there's a chnce they're not done. Am I crazy or have they only lost one game?
Is that why so many people are trying to end it all now? When these new cults get together to form their suicide pacts, couldn't they at least keep it to California where it's expected?If the season ended today we'd be in the playoffs,
It seems like so many people are saying that the Pats are washed up or trying to explain why maybe there's a chnce they're not done. Am I crazy or have they only lost one game? Why is everyone going so nuts here? Why don't we wait until they're 2-6 or 5-1 or 6-5 before we and the media start determining if the Pats are terrible, in big trouble, or still good.
The result was seeing that in 2 games, Wilfork and Seymour had owned the line, and only had a few plays where they were taken out, defeated by their blocker.
-----
Mayo generally gets off blocks and makes plays, and was impressive in the first two games. But its important to keep in mind, that as the inside linebacker on the weakside, he's the guy with the best chance to make a play, and the best chance to benefit from Sey and Wilfork eating up O-Linemen.