Refs blow call by overturning White's reception.

[neuronet]

Yeah.. I can understand how a TOE / HEEL scenario fits with that rule.. OH WAIT.. that ruling is the exact opposite..

Not to mention that there wasn't clear evidence that his left foot was OOB or that he was "in the normal process of taking a step" (which he wasn't). But, yeah, I see the ridiculous "approved ruling" that contradicts the NFL's own rule book on what constitutes a catch.. And you wonder why they are putting together a Committee of players to determine what is really a catch..

Reading comprehension: look at the part that I put in bold because I knew you would not understand it, so I highlighted the key passage when I posted it.

Second, just admit you were wrong for god's sake it is embarassing yer like the black knight on Monty Python.