PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Inactive players

Status
Not open for further replies.

outhere

Rookie
Joined
Jul 8, 2005
Messages
34
Reaction score
0
Just a question about the whole inactive player policy. Why does the NFL do this? It doesn't really make sense to have players on your roster you can't play. I mean what happens if 2 QBs get hurt and the 3rd one is inactive. Is there some rational reason buried in NFL logic for this policy? If there isn't, is there movement to make all 53 on the roster playable?
 
A) For teams know what to expect from the other

B) To prevent one team from having an advantage is the other has injured players

C) To prevent over-specialization of players (more players, fewer duties)
 
Just a question about the whole inactive player policy. Why does the NFL do this? It doesn't really make sense to have players on your roster you can't play. I mean what happens if 2 QBs get hurt and the 3rd one is inactive. Is there some rational reason buried in NFL logic for this policy? If there isn't, is there movement to make all 53 on the roster playable?
My bet is $$$. That is always the NFL answer.

I'm guessing players need a certain number of active games to get an accrued season for pension benefits.

When the roster size was raised is when the inactive crap started. Has to be $$$.
 
My bet is $$$. That is always the NFL answer.

I'm guessing players need a certain number of active games to get an accrued season for pension benefits.

When the roster size was raised is when the inactive crap started. Has to be $$$.

Maybe. But accrued seasons depend on whether a play is on the roster, not whether he is active or not. It may or not be the same for benefits.
 
Just a question about the whole inactive player policy. Why does the NFL do this? It doesn't really make sense to have players on your roster you can't play. I mean what happens if 2 QBs get hurt and the 3rd one is inactive. Is there some rational reason buried in NFL logic for this policy? If there isn't, is there movement to make all 53 on the roster playable?

The QB position is the only one where the QB, who is inactive, is actually dressed and can play. But if the #3 QB enters the game prior to the 4th quarter, neither the #1 or #2 QBs can re-enter the game.
 
Maybe. But accrued seasons depend on whether a play is on the roster, not whether he is active or not. It may or not be the same for benefits.
Yeah, I honestly don't know, but when I think of weird NFL rules, I always follow the money trail...

Also, there is more than one kind of accrued season, as we found out with Guss Scott.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Patriots News 06-20: The Not-So-Ideal Jacas Situation
MORSE: Looking At Patriots Wide Receiver Room and Gabe Jacas Mess
Key Questions Remain After Patriots Mini Camp: Little Margin For Error at Several Positions
Patriots News 06-14, Patriots Wrap Up Spring Workouts
Patriots Rookie Lomu Reveals “Weird” First Days at Right Tackle
Vrabel’s Goal For Christian Barmore in 2026: “Being able to finish”
MORSE: Day 3 of Patriots Mini-Camp
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference 6/11
MORSE: Day 2 of Patriots Mini-Camp
TRANSCRIPT: Caleb Lomu Media Interview 6/10
Back
Top