maineman209
Veteran Starter w/Big Long Term Deal
- Joined
- Mar 8, 2017
- Messages
- 9,642
- Reaction score
- 20,258
So what you are saying is FBs are similar to TEs?
Not every player in the NFL who's been given the "FB" positional designation by his team fulfills the same functions/roles in his team's offense (e.g., Spencer Ware) that Develin does in the Pats' offense.
I'm not generalizing about players who have the "FB" designation. I'm talking specifically about Develin and his function in the Pats' offense.
Again, this is only important in terms of thinking about roster spots on the final 53.
"Do the Pats go with 3 TEs or four?"
The fact that Develin (the player, NOT "the FB") can, and often has, functioned as a move-TE in the Pats offense, and the fact that Fleming has considerable experience as a 3rd, in-line blocking TE, are things that need to be taken into consideration when attempting to answer that question.
Lengel is a big, in-line blocking TE who can also run routes and catch a bit (and maybe not as well as Develin). O'Shaughnessy is likely a high-value special teamer who, like pretty much the rest of the TE candidates in Camp, is more the size of a move-TE. So, When considering Develin as a "capable, part-time TE3", which one provides the most value in terms of redundancy (backup) while saving a roster spot somewhere else?
And yet I still see folks including Develin as part of the RB group when it comes to the roster spot "numbers game" mainly because of his positional designation and the fact that he lines up in the backfield.