Search results

Are you people kidding me, complaining about Thursday night football? What's next, *****ing about a Monday morning blowjob?

Healthy or injured, Woodhead >>> Vereen. Time will tell comrades.

Why? I think he seemed to run better with more carries. Woodhead and Bolden did OK spelling him. If he keeps this up, maybe he could be a true three down back, and no more RBBC would be needed.

There's a big difference between auditioning with the first team, as he did after the NO game, and challenging the next guy up on the depth chart. I never heard any writer ever give an inkling that Ridley's spot was in jeopardy. He's been the clear cut #1 all along.

This could be the most physical team, on both sides of the ball, since 2004.

Link please. I diligently followed training camp reports and saw no such thing mentioned. He got better as it went on, but at most, challenged Woodhead's change of pace/ third down role.

Did injuries prevent him from dominating training camp and becoming either the clear cut #1 RB or the clear cut #1 3rd down back?

He has good measurables and played well in college, but we have no idea if that will translate to the pro game. Injuries aside, the fact that he did not overtake Woodhead or steal more reps from Ridley gives reason to doubt his success. Part of the problems are some fans expectations: people on...

He's got the talent to be a decent backup to Woodhead.

How about consequences like de-motivating the rest of the guys that were actually IN camp? How do you think they'd react to a guy skipping out all August, then coming in and getting paid MORE? Why bother even showing up?

Your posts have me thinking about some possible metrics to measure the effect of a teams time-possession strategy on their ability to win games. Just watching the Pats last year, I'd say one weakness they had at times was putting together long clock-killing drives, and preventing other teams...

BB took a bunch of fliers on some well-known has been's, never was's, and wannabe's. They were calculated risks, and none of them panned out. Alot've them seemed like good ideas at the time. But do you think they'd be better off with these guys on the roster? Gaffney's the only one...

Thirty-thousand posts. That's thirteen or fourteen posts a day, every day, for six straight years. Let's say an average post takes five minutes. Some way less, some way more, but over the long haul, five a post. Folks, that is over 2,500 hours of pure Patriot posting right there. Over one...

No, it's a demonstration of Poe' Law.

Yet another sign that Danny Woodhead's gonna get cut...

Re: Waters Locker Cleaned Out Mixed feelings on this one. Obviously, he's better than all of the alternatives. On the other hand, I've never been a big fan of letting guys skip training camp just because they're "too old for that ****."

All but two of them (Bolden and Francis) are placeholders until they sign another WR or two.

I'm praying for the Chiefs to make a mistake and cut Nate Eachus.

After seeing Gaffney and Stallworth both getting cut, I'm thinking the Pats will carry four TE's and five RB's; with only five WRs: Welker, Lloyd, Branch, Edelman, Slater. I'm not sure why they'd cut Vereen or Woodhead. Like it or not, Woodhead is their best pass blocker, for starters. And...

Re: The Official Patriots vs Buc's game thread That Kozlowski touchdown reminded me of Michaelangelo's "David" sculpture.