Search results

Does Kraft not realize you can hire people who aren't former Patriots linebackers as head coach?

Because within 2 years the Krafts would be gone and Tom Brady would have taken over the team. Which I mean would be awesome for everyone except the Krafts, but still, its pretty easy to see why they didn't want that.

You could say his foot is out the door

Someone needs to call a neuro consultant and have Maye shut down for his own good next week

Aaron Dobson looked like Randy Moss compared to Polk though.

He actually isn't better. 9 recs on 18 tgts 55 yards 0TDs At this point I don't think you can even say he is better than Polk. :eek:

So I think part of the issue with this thread is the assumption is that if the results are bad the decisions are bad. When that isn't true. If you choose to sign Player-X over Player-Y and X is a bust and Y plays great then its fair to characterize that as a poor decision. If you try to sign...

Vikings have to be the best team in the league at picking WR. Moss, Jefferson, Diggs(5th round), Addison, Thielen(UDFA) Why can't the Pats do that?

If the Patriots get a top WR for $20m it would be a steal. Honestly I would be worried about their being another "Hernandez situation" that the GM found about and used as leverage.

Arguably the worst playoff defensive performance in league history Even if the Patriots had had Prime Brady, Gronk, Moss, Welker, and Edelman they would have had trouble in the game.

How is he more valuable than fellow rookie QB Jayden Daniels?

But how many went on a darkness retreat?

Its probably to late in the season for that. He could, however, be SB MVP Tyquan Thorntono_O

Did some looking around It looks like this year is an aberration. Last year it was actually a fair amount above the long term average Were there any rule changes to account for the poor success this year?

I guess it could be different now. I did the math a few years ago https://www.boydsbets.com/nfl-two-point-conversion-success-rate/ That says there is a tiny advantage to it. The real advantage I see is avoiding injury in OT for a game that is basically irrelevant.

I think that is more playing scared than inexcusable. Pure math shows that you get a 1-2% I think advantage to win by going for 2 over overtime(remember you can miss the PAT and lose too). What playing for OT lets you do is delay losing, which for some reason people like. If he goes for 2 and...

Be funny if they went 20-0 but Mahomes had less TD passes than Maye. Note currently Mahomes has 8TDs and 9ints

Honestly going for 2 is always the right call if you are bad team. First, of all if you crunch the pure math there is a slight benefit to going for 2 over XP+OT(I think was maybe 1-2%). Don't forget you can miss the XP, especially nowadays. Second, at this point the Patriots winning doesn't...

But it is better than the BoB offense of last year. Matt Patricia really deserves an apology cake at this point

I don't know, I think if Brady got 95 yards rushing in a game that's at least a b+