- Joined
- Apr 4, 2013
- Messages
- 16,654
- Reaction score
- 18,727
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Vrabel definitely has first hand information to make that decision.Thought I saw some conjecture somewhere that the Pats will be willing to move up in the 1st to secure the OL they want. Wonder if this is the guy.
Vrabel definitely has first hand information to make that decision.
Edge is a more pressing need, plus taking a guy in the 1st just to have him sit on a bench for a year is not very exciting.
With that said, we could do A LOT worse than big Max.
Blake Miller is my favorite tackle around 31, the guy is really athletic, really strong and is just shy of having an 84" wingspan.Pats have to do their due diligence on every one in the range of 31. I personally think Iheanachor fits better into a zone-heavy offense rather than our gap-heavy (power) offense. With that said, I think he is also talented enough to sit behind Big Mo and then start next year. Blake Miller would be a much better fit as he is very similar to Big Mo, and extensive experience in power-blocking schemes at Clemson.
...or SF, if they move on from Trent WilliamsHe looks like the pick....but we need to make sure the teams right in front dont grab him....like the Jets or KC
He looks like the pick....but we need to make sure the teams right in front dont grab him....like the Jets or KC
Edge is a more pressing need, plus taking a guy in the 1st just to have him sit on a bench for a year is not very exciting.
With that said, we could do A LOT worse than big Max.
Definitely not even close to being true. This is why top edges are always drafted before great tackles, just like they will be this year...Edge is much easier to find than tackle. Teams don't let good tackles go. If you lock down tackle for the next 10 years, you do it. Pass rushers are always available in FA and trade. You need a RT next season.
Jets have #2,16 and Chiefs are at #9. Would either take him that high?He looks like the pick....but we need to make sure the teams right in front dont grab him....like the Jets or KC
No, you are wrong, we don't "need" a RT for next season. Moses did a more than adequate job last year. Besides any rookie you draft at 31 will likely be someone you are drafting to DEVELOP, not start. If Max winds up being the pick, it will be as a depth piece in 26 with the ideas that he start in 27.Edge is much easier to find than tackle. Teams don't let good tackles go. If you lock down tackle for the next 10 years, you do it. Pass rushers are always available in FA and trade. You need a RT next season.
As Belichick said, if you draft for need and take the wrong guy, you've wasted a pick and still have a need.No, you are wrong, we don't "need" a RT for next season. Moses did a more than adequate job last year. Besides any rookie you draft at 31 will likely be someone you are drafting to DEVELOP, not start. If Max winds up being the pick, it will be as a depth piece in 26 with the ideas that he start in 27.
Remember, at 31 this is likely the 6th-9th best OLman prospect. No guarantees here (for anyone they pick. And they will be out of the 2nd level of picks (15-45) as well in the 2nd round. Much as I want an Edge rusher as a need, where we are picking (31 and 62) best player available regardless of need should be the primary rule. Whomever winds up at the top of their board when it is our turn to pick, THAT'S the guy I want, and let the chips fall where they may.
No, you are wrong, we don't "need" a RT for next season. Moses did a more than adequate job last year. Besides any rookie you draft at 31 will likely be someone you are drafting to DEVELOP, not start. If Max winds up being the pick, it will be as a depth piece in 26 with the ideas that he start in 27.
Remember, at 31 this is likely the 6th-9th best OLman prospect. No guarantees here (for anyone they pick. And they will be out of the 2nd level of picks (15-45) as well in the 2nd round. Much as I want an Edge rusher as a need, where we are picking (31 and 62) best player available regardless of need should be the primary rule. Whomever winds up at the top of their board when it is our turn to pick, THAT'S the guy I want, and let the chips fall where they may.
| 23 | 784 |
| 204 | 8K |
| 21 | 4K |
From our archive - this week all-time:
April 4 - April 19 (Through 26yrs)











