Just because you can't stand it, doesn't mean it's not 'reality'.
As written by media, and believed by opponents, fans and the league.
Yammering about the Patriots being to 20% of all the SB when they stacked 9 of those appearances up in an 18yr span doesn't change history.
Let's take an accurate look at history:
Let's recap:
From 1960 - 1970 - The Patriots did not have an official "Home Stadium".
Nomads. Who, in half (five) of the ten AFL seasons, still finished within 1/2-1 1/2 games of the division title and and a spot in the AFL title game, with one appearance - which, like in 1986, was a complete blowout, reinforcing the fan perception you accurately point out.
However, there was no stadium because there was no local government support. That was not the Sullivans' fault. Schaefer Stadium was one of only a half dozen privately funded stadiums in the entire country.
Every Patriots owner has tried to move the team: Orthwein to St. Louis, Kraft to Hartford, and Kiam (with Sullivan) to Jacksonville, at the end. We're still here because Tagliabue didn't want to lose the Boston media market, and Finneran somehow had a change of heart.
From 1967 - 1975, the Pats didn't have a winning season. The BEST they did was 7-7.
The longest losing streak in Patriots history: Seven (7) seasons.
Not 20. Every other franchise has had multiple consecutive decades of utter futility. True haplessness, on field performance actually worthy of the laughingstock label.
Anyway, the departures of Parilli & Buoniconti began the losing, which ended with Fairbanks.
Then you have how the Pats were duped into trading Nick Buonicotti to the Dolphins for Kim Hammond based only on highlight films of Hammond without actually working the guy out.
Don't forget about the immortal Clive Rush.
Then, with Grogan, one (1) losing season in a 13 year stretch. However, people either believed the Patriots somehow 'deserved' the Dreith theft, or they denied it happened at all. And the Super Bowl XX blowout again served to satisfy and comfort people in their perception of the Patriots as unworthy. And the Patriots had only themselves to blame for the unhappy endings to the 1985, 1986 & 1988 seasons: Starting Tony Eason each time over astronomically superior, healthy, available quarterbacks.
From 1989 - 1992, they didn't have a winning season and put up 2 of the worst seasons ever with a 1 win season and a 2 win season.
The Kiam ownership was a mess.
But all he had to do was keep/bring back Flutie, make him the starter and hire a coach who would simply play him, and none of that would have mattered.
The old stadium would have been sold out for every game and the Patriots would have been in the playoffs, at least. Any objective observation of his performance wherever he was and whatever his age screams this, but it obviously required people getting over his stature.
Anyway, 1990-1992. Three (3) seasons. Not twenty.
Coach Parcells deciding to come
back here is one of the pivotal moments in franchise history, immediately turning the culture into a winning one and setting the foundation for the greatest sports dynasty of this century so far. It just can't be overstated, regardless of how he left. At the time, Bill's health was improved enough for him to return to the sidelines, he could write his own ticket wherever and New England looked like the least promising or attractive place for him to land. We should be grateful to Willie McDonough for setting up the interview with Orthwein, who was cranky his entire time here after spending a fortune bailing out the Sullivans' enormous debts, and he took it out on the best logo in the sport.
The Pats being given the moniker of "laughing stock" of the league was well earned until the 3rd SB of the Belichick dynasty.
Don't know if you may be misstating this, but there wasn't anything laughingstock-ish after Brady became the starter. Bill kept his head, kept Brady in there, and they won two out of three titles, both years overcoming adversity and hardship both before and during those regular seasons.
By the third Super Bowl for the 2004 season, the Patriots were considered a model organization.
Of course, this was unacceptable to people used to the false (as far as on field success) laughingstock narrative and their exponentially increasing cacophony of baseless false cheating accusations was rewarded, corroborated and confirmed by Goodell and his minions/henchmen upon his commissionership in 2007. The false laughingstock narrative nurtured and preserved since the merger in 1970 is the foundation for this, which was even outdone seven years later when the Patriots literally did nothing, and were unjustly punished even more as 'repeat offenders'.