PatsFans.com Menu
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans
PatsFans.com - The Hub For New England Patriots Fans

Vote for Pats Position Choice at Pick 69

Next Opp: TBD
THE HUB FOR PATRIOTS FANS SINCE 2000

CURRENT POPULAR DISCUSSIONS:
I'm bored and sick of Russini; mock draft
Posted By: yukon cornelius
April 18, 2026 at 12:10 am
Total Replies: 7

# Of Users:5
captain stoneBUSTAMOVEOne-If-By-Seayukon corneliusDoubleDeluxe
Russini & Vrabel Nothing to see here?
Posted By: Betterthanmost
April 17, 2026 at 11:41 pm
Total Replies: 1057

# Of Users:110
IanstcjonesThe Gr8estSean Pa PatriotCrazy Patriot GuyDarManbresnatuckeverlastingTriumphHypedBelizePats
TODAY'S MOST REACTED POSTS:
XLIXRussini & Vrabel Nothing to see here?
1 Reactions
04/17 at 7:20 pm

By: XLIX

Clonamery2026 Pre-Draft Meetings
1 Reactions
04/17 at 4:56 am

By: Clonamery

KenRuinard/USATodayNetworkSouthCarolina/USATODAYNETWORKviaImagnImages
');">
TODAY'S TOP POSTERS:#
One-If-By-Sea3 posts
 

Pick the Position you want to see the Pats select at 69?

  • WR

    Votes: 9 36.0%
  • RB

    Votes: 7 28.0%
  • TE

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • DT/EDGE

    Votes: 7 28.0%
  • LB

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • DB

    Votes: 0 0.0%

  • Total voters
    25
  • Poll closed .

bakes781

Experienced Starter w/First Big Contract
Joined
Apr 14, 2006
Messages
5,962
Reaction score
4,837
they've already addressed OT in Rounds 1 & 2 so I'm removing that from the choices.

Tomorrow morning I will post another poll with players from whichever position has the most votes.
 
I can see why you want to go this route but it does reduce the BPA element. For example, WR is the biggest need but I'd probably take Treveyon Henderson or Mason Taylor at this point. However it's your game and I appreciate everything you do so I'm happy to go with it.

It absolutely makes sense to try to narrow the field with this approach but perhaps when you get to do the poll to choose the player you can add in a nominate your own prospect option so that some of us can choose our BPA. So for example, if WR wins here, we can still choose a Henderson. Just a suggestion.
 
Last edited:
they've already addressed OT in Rounds 1 & 2 so I'm removing that from the choices.

Tomorrow morning I will post another poll with players from whichever position has the most votes.
Sorry to make more work for you. but i think it's only fair that you also list the top 3-5 players still available for each of those positions.

A lot of people don't have the time to pore over who has been taken. and if they see their binky's name is still available on the list at least they know they should be interested in that position.

For instance what's the use of just blindly listing WR, when you don't know if all the WRs you want have already been picked dry, and find out later you voted for position WR but can only pick from leftover scrubs, for example?

Still think the pot luck approach from before was best because it only required one vote. but maybe it takes more work because you have to consider what are the best 10-15 candidates left for pick #69. Lucky number there, huh?
 
No support for Ozzy Trapilo here?

I’m all for Mason Taylor at this point. Seems like good value at a position needing youth and upside.
 
for 69?






apologies, couldn't resist, lol

selected DT/Edge in poll
 
No support for Ozzy Trapilo here?

I’m all for Mason Taylor at this point. Seems like good value at a position needing youth and upside.
Not from my desk in the war room. Went OL 1-2. other positions need attention. Trapilo would be in play if we didn't take Simmons R2.
 
Not from my desk in the war room. Went OL 1-2. other positions need attention. Trapilo would be in play if we didn't take Simmons R2.
It wasn’t a serious consideration. Haha. As much as I’d love to see a local kid and fellow BC High alum on the team, I think we’re good on tackles this high in the draft.
 
If you are participating in the mock than you know what's available. If you don't than click on the selections only thread.

We are limited to 10 choices so when it comes down to actual names this will make it easier.
 
So they went with a possible LT in R1 or R2. Did they go DL/EDGE with the other pick? If not, then I prioritize that.

We currently have 4 picks in the first 3 rounds. If we use those 4 picks as they are, I'd ideally want a WR, a LT, and a DL/EDGE, along with another OT or DL/EDGE.
 
4 was Will Campbell

38 was Josh Simmons
 
We addressed the d-line in FA, gotta go WR at potentially both the 3rd round picks.
 
Here is PFFs top 300


Here are the selections thus far...
 
Looks like WRs available include Royals, Restrepo, Savion Williams, and Noel.
 
I like the WRs and TEs available in this range. There are a few good RBs as well, but maybe we can wait on the RBs until round 4. I just realized we have TWO 3rd round picks. Do we really need to double dip at WR or can we go like WR + TE or WR + RB depending on who's the best talent left?
 
Looks like we have a tie for WR and DL. Uh oh
 
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 6 – A Week Before the Draft
TRANSCRIPT: Eliot Wolf Pre-Draft Press Conference 4/13
Patriots News 04-12, What To Watch For In The NFL Draft
MORSE: Pre-Draft Patriots News and Notes
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
MORSE: Patriots Mock Draft 5
Mark Morse
1 week ago
Patriots Part Ways with Another Linebacker as Offseason Roster Shake-Up Continues
Patriots News 04-05, Mock Draft 2.0, Patriots Look For OL Depth
MORSE: 18 Game Schedule and Other Patriots Notes
TRANSCRIPT: Mike Vrabel Press Conference at the League Meetings 3/31
MORSE: Smokescreens and Misinformation Leading Up to Patriots Draft
Back
Top