SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.It would be horrific for the league to cripple defenses even more by making additional protections/rule changes for mobile QBs...
That's really what this is about, mobile QBs that run around like a chicken with its head cut off until someone comes open
They're hard enough to defend as is, if they start handicapping defenders against these mobile qbs then get use to 50+ score games
It would be horrific for the league to cripple defenses even more by making additional protections/rule changes for mobile QBs...
That's really what this is about, mobile QBs that run around like a chicken with its head cut off until someone comes open
They're hard enough to defend as is, if they start handicapping defenders against these mobile qbs then get use to 50+ score games
Yup, as you and someone on the other Rodgers thread said, if people are gonna (wrongly) put you in the GOAT conversation because your mobility gives you an advantage over a pocket passer, then it has to count against you when that mobility gets you hurt. I doubt you'll see people discuss with with Rodgers in the national press, but it's absolutely the case.
Link:
Aaron Rodgers injury may usher in a radical rules change, and other Week 6 thoughts
I respect Florio but making QBs non hittable after the ball is out (similar to kickers) is a terrible idea...and a couple of the comments show why.
He also got it wrong re Brady’s injury, that was Carson Palmer that prompted the rule change.
This is an easy fix. Allow the offense to have 12 men on the field. The QB isn't a real football player anyways.
The notion of giving QB's protection like kickers or punters is absurd. Those players have to follow a very set path and once they deviate from that path, they lose the protection of being a kicker/punter.
It was a rough break for Rodgers, both figuratively and literally. However, despite Rodgers being pissy about it, I saw it as a clean play. Not to mention, as others have pointed out, when you are known for being a scrambling QB who gets out of crazy jams while simultaneously humiliating opponents, you cannot blame a defender for following through.
If he didn't put his arm out so far away from his body like Romo always did and just took the tackle he would have been fine.
QBs don't need more protection, some of them need to learn how to fall safely though.
I wouldn't call it "blatant," but it is borderline. Rodgers has gotten rid of the ball and completed his throwing motion when he is hit and the defender has to take one more step before he hits him as he is finishing his throwing motion. On the other hand, the timing was split second and I don't know how he could have stopped his forward motion. In comparison, i's not like a hit yesterday (too much redzone, so I don't know which QB) where the QB was clearly just standing there and watching the play after making his throw when he is hit...The rules already govern against the hit that took down Rogers.
It was a blatant late hit.
The defender chose to ignore the rule. Same with the ref.