Welcome to PatsFans.com

Wow! Rod Woodson really made a stupid argument for Montana over Brady

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by Rob0729, Feb 3, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,726
    Likes Received:
    219
    Ratings:
    +476 / 5 / -1

    He kept on harping on the numbers that Brady isn't as good as Montana. He said that Brady doesn't match up with Montana because this is the first year that Brady had more than 30 TDs and the most he had prior to this is 28.

    Does Woodson realize that Montana had only one year where he threw for more than 28 TDs? He had 31 in 1987 and otherwise, he had one year where he had 28, another with 27, and two more with 26. The rest of his career he had under 20 TDs a season.

    Does Woodson realize that Brady has better numbers his first seven years as a starter than Montana has for his first eight years as a starter (Montana had a strike year and only started the first half of his firs year as a starter)?

    I really wish these so called experts would actually do their homework before speaking. Woodson argued that stats would determin who is better, but that argument points to Brady.
  2. Canada's #1 Pats Fan

    Canada's #1 Pats Fan Rookie

    Joined:
    Aug 18, 2006
    Messages:
    1,394
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    just remember with the media - always consider the source. Rod Woodson. Enough said.
  3. Rob0729

    Rob0729 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Nov 14, 2006
    Messages:
    29,726
    Likes Received:
    219
    Ratings:
    +476 / 5 / -1

    BTW, I guess I can see why Woodson would think Montana was always getting over 30 TDs every year since his only year in San Fran was the only year Montana got over 30 TDs.
  4. ShrewBeer

    ShrewBeer Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 25, 2007
    Messages:
    669
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    the media is made up of the brightest football minds in the world
  5. Run DMC

    Run DMC Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2007
    Messages:
    2,498
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    Woodson was a good player, but he is really, really bad with a mic in his hand.
    Jeezus!
  6. karran_s

    karran_s Rookie

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2008
    Messages:
    302
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Woodson is a real jerk... He couldn't respond to Deion Sanders when he logically made the argument about the "intangibles" that make a great quarterback, not just records... If that were the case, we would be talking about Brady vs Brett Favre, vs Peyton etc.. It's about winning and doing it under difficult circumstances, at the highest level. It's what Brady does best..

    I couldn't have made any better arguments for Brady than Deion Sanders.. hats off to him.. I like him a lot..
  7. stcjones

    stcjones Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    5,647
    Likes Received:
    3
    Ratings:
    +4 / 7 / -1

    #12 Jersey

    Don't you know by now....Rod Woodson is an ignorant jacka$$??? The fact that Brady has never until this year, had the kind of receiver(s) that Montana had available to him his whole career in SF.......Woodson ought to do his homework before coming out and looking like a sphincter......;) Sphincter......got to love that word......:)
  8. SteelRaptor

    SteelRaptor Rookie

    Joined:
    Oct 13, 2007
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    Woodson was drafted by the Steelers in 87'.

    In comparison though, Brady only needs that 4th superbowl trophy to cement his place with Montana and Bradshaw as the only QBs to win 4 superbowls, The other comparisons are silly, Brady, in his prime is already a legend, and believe me, that hurts me to say that.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>