- Joined
- Sep 2, 2006
- Messages
- 8,744
- Reaction score
- 8,082
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I'm going to go out on a limb:
DE: Burgess
DT: Wilfork
DT: Warren
DE: Green
Warren was a DT in college and I think he would be more effective inside than outside in a 4-3 scheme.
I'm going to go out on a limb:
DE: Burgess
DT: Wilfork
DT: Warren
DE: Green
Warren was a DT in college and I think he would be more effective inside than outside in a 4-3 scheme.
I'm going to go out on a limb:
DE: Burgess
DT: Wilfork
DT: Warren
DE: Green
Warren was a DT in college and I think he would be more effective inside than outside in a 4-3 scheme.
I think Pryor is going to get the nod over Brace... He's my binky.
he said passing downs...definite passing down im going with
DE-Burgess/adalius
DT-Mike Wright/Jarvis Green
DT-Myron Pryor
DE-Tully Banta Cain/adalius thomas
Wilfork and Brace on a passing down only to draw a double team and free up a safety or lb blitzing...
WE HAVE SCAAAAARRY VERSATILITY! Run stoppers, pass rushers, and 3-4, 4-3, nickel, and dime greatness! And we obviously have faith in BB and Pees to devise a scary pressure scheme on passing downs.
I agree that it is downright scary to have Brace, Banta-Cain and Pryor instead of Seymour, Bruschi and Vrabel.