Sam Bam Cunningham
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Jan 18, 2017
- Messages
- 2,554
- Reaction score
- 4,219
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Finally. A tall mobile qb!
Well....we could draft Trey Lance 2.0 and pick up Brock Purdy 2.0?I’m so torn in this draft as who is the best QB,
I think once you do your due diligence you move to 1 to get your guy.
Can’t get this wrong.
Buyer beware of the sudden "draft risers". This is a tactic teams use to bait a team ahead of them to take that player.Will jayden daniels pan out like giants daniels. One who suddenly rose up the draft boards .
I am so torn .maybe just get marvin harrison and overpay for Tee Higgins and get mayfield or Flacco as bridge qb while we draft somebody in 2nd round .
He’s actually no smaller than Lamar Jackson or Randall Cunningham coming out of college. Hell, he’s essentially the same size as them in their prime. Lamar is 6’2 215, Cunningham 6’4 212 &. Daniels is 6’4 210. He’ll also add weight/strength during his initial years. He’s got some things to clean up (they all do), but he’s a heck of prospect.Quick someone name a QB who succeeded in the NFL with a skinny ass and twig legs.
Randall CunninghamQuick someone name a QB who succeeded in the NFL with a skinny ass and twig legs.
If the Bears stick with fields (I believe they will) Washington will prob make a play to move up from 2 to 1 for Caleb Williams. Chicago will take MHJ at 2 leaving us with the decision between Maye Daniels and Penix.
The someone else is likely us then. Next highest team that should consider a QB is NYG at 6. The Bears run the risk of missing out on both MHJ and Nabors with teams like Arizona and LAC above them with WR being a need if they trade with NY.Nah, think someone else will jump
all the way to #1. Not the Commanders...they will be fine with Williams or Maye.
Strength of scheduleCan someone explain why Washington gets the #2 picks when the Patriots lost to Washington and they have the same record?
Inverse order of "Strength-Of-Schedule"......Can someone explain why Washington gets the #2 picks when the Patriots lost to Washington and they have the same record?