I answered the question put to me, but don't have all day to argue with folks whose minds aren't open on this subject and won't change. Before you accuse me of the same, read what I first wrote--before judging what's going on here we need to know what Matt Walsh claims to know and then and only then determine how much weight to give it in terms of whether it's actually true or not. That's a truism, folks, yet people here will argue that until the cows come home. If you want the Spygate cloud over your franchise to go away that has to happen, full end stop. Otherwise you will be subject to sniping on this topic for years. What are you all so afraid of? That it might be true what he's claiming? Doesn't the rest of the League deserve to find that out? If what Walsh says is "incredible", then the Pats and the League have every right to put on a defense in the public arena (which they've already started), but the imbalance of power here is the reason for the impasse as a legal matter. They can destroy this man's life, make no mistake about it, whether he tells the truth or not.
It may sound odd to many of the "True Believers" who've attacked me, but even when I'm a fan of a team, I try to look at things objectively. Try it sometime, you might like it.
