- Joined
- Feb 27, 2010
- Messages
- 12,084
- Reaction score
- 17,864
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.This guy must look like the 2nd coming of Curtis Martin in practice to get picked up again. With injuries at CB, DL, and OG, I would think the roster spot would go to one of those positions.
The Pats were carrying an extra O-lineman to begin with at 11. So, I can understand not adding one with Neal going onto the IR.
I also don't believe that they'd add a DL since Wright and Pryor are both likely to be back for the game.
CB is the position I am somewhat surprised with. However, I'm not sure that having an extra CB on the roster would help them against the Jets since that is the one likely to be sitting out since the Pats like to use Sergio Brown and Patrick Chung to cover the slot receivers.
The Pats were carrying an extra O-lineman to begin with at 11. So, I can understand not adding one with Neal going onto the IR.
I also don't believe that they'd add a DL since Wright and Pryor are both likely to be back for the game.
CB is the position I am somewhat surprised with. However, I'm not sure that having an extra CB on the roster would help them against the Jets since that is the one likely to be sitting out since the Pats like to use Sergio Brown and Patrick Chung to cover the slot receivers.
The Pats were carrying an extra O-lineman to begin with at 11. So, I can understand not adding one with Neal going onto the IR.
I also don't believe that they'd add a DL since Wright and Pryor are both likely to be back for the game.
CB is the position I am somewhat surprised with. However, I'm not sure that having an extra CB on the roster would help them against the Jets since that is the one likely to be sitting out since the Pats like to use Sergio Brown and Patrick Chung to cover the slot receivers.
They actually had 10 OL before putting Neal on IR. I think 8-9 is plenty, though.
This was a 2011 move- nothing more unless they think Taylor is totally done with the bad little piggies.
With that said, He's 5'11 222 and runs a 4.53 -40. 49 board say that the character issues is K-State are unfounded and hes a good, hardworking kid.
This was a 2011 move- nothing more unless they think Taylor is totally done with the bad little piggies.
With that said, He's 5'11 222 and runs a 4.53 -40. 49 board say that the character issues is K-State are unfounded and hes a good, hardworking kid.
Probably for insurance once Fred Taylor hits IR after his next two carries.
If Taylor was done, he's be on the IR and not off the Injury Report.
Recovery of this injury can take three to four weeks depending on how bad the sprain is. If the athlete does not look after this injury then it may develop into Hallux Limitus. This is a decreased range of motion due to arthritis around the joint. This can cause problems in the rest of the foot or lower limb due to changes to your walking cycle (gait).
If the move was for 2011, why would you put this player on the active roster?
Thanks for the correction. It was 10.. And they usually only keep 9..
according to official Patriots Facebook page. I don't understand why the team wants 5 RBs when we have 4 CBs, one being injured...