Welcome to PatsFans.com

The OL

Discussion in 'PatsFans.com - Patriots Fan Forum' started by mgteich, Jun 14, 2008.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,856
    Likes Received:
    127
    Ratings:
    +335 / 21 / -2

    I think we are in fine shape, even without Neal.

    Neal seems not ready to play. I will have him on my projected PUP list until further notice. Is there anyone else who hasn't practiced?

    INTERIOR (5)
    STARTERS: Koppen, Mankins, Yates
    BACKUPS: Hochstein, Mruczkowski
    Mruc has been the last OL cut several times. Like Hochstein, he is a backup guard and center. Yates has started. We will look at OT's who might be better guards than Yates. But, Dante has liked Yates, and started him in the past. I expect us to continue to look at OG's to bring to camp.

    TACKLE (4)
    STARTERS: Light, Kaczur
    BACKUPS: O'Callaghan, Britt/Ross
    Posters here seem to not like our OT's. I guess our passing game needs to be better than last year, with fewer sacks. As I recall, we did lead the league!
    But there is always room for improvement. Personally, I think it is a positive for Kaczur that Dante may be looking to possibly starting him at RG, but I don't think it will happen unless O'Callaghan or Ross is great in camp and in the preseason. I expect us to continue to look at OT's to bring to camp.
  2. JR4

    JR4 In the Starting Line-up PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2004
    Messages:
    2,817
    Likes Received:
    20
    Ratings:
    +34 / 3 / -2

    You really think Yates is starter quality? You're Ok with that? :confused:
    .... I mean needing to use Yates means PATs Ol is in ... " fine shape"?
    I just have a hard time buying Yates week in and out.
  3. AzPatsFan

    AzPatsFan On the Roster

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    6,207
    Likes Received:
    102
    Ratings:
    +236 / 22 / -10

    I am not impressed with Yates.

    Just to complicate your life consider this. Barry Simms was a LT for the Raiders. In his last year with the Cards, they put Ollie Ross at LT, after a career at RT, too. Is BB looking for LT depth? Why?

    If either could backup Light, does that free Britt to beef up and than really compete for the RT position for the first time? Or is Britt failing?

    I continue to believe that Neal is gone for a considerable time, based on the way he looked going down in the Superbowl. And the Kaczur move is a move to let Nick play his natural position, where he can excel, rather than merely contribute, I believe.

    The PFW people have come around to suggest that hypothesis too, but they offer this observation. Neal's shoulder is "always" injured and that, not the Knee, is the real issue. I recall he tore his shoulder up, after pouncing on a lateral and having thousands of pounds of beef pile on a few years ago.

    What is his real injury? Did he have a Knee reconstruction, or did he have a shoulder operation? Or both? I don't know, and thought the surgery must have been for the knee, but I could be wrong...

    Did anyone see whether O'C looked any lighter at mini-camp? I heard that Britt was slimmer though, trying to get quicker, probably. That is a reasonable sign for O'C eventual success too.:D
  4. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,287
    Likes Received:
    520
    Ratings:
    +1,637 / 70 / -75

    Disable Jersey

    Clady looks like an even better choice now than before.
  5. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,856
    Likes Received:
    127
    Ratings:
    +335 / 21 / -2

    We look at two new LT's with no success at other positions. Our conclusions are that 1) Kaczur is qualified to start at RG 2) Britt is now qualified to start to start at RG, and 3) the folks that have backed up and started in the past (Yates and Hochstein) are worthless.

    Perhaps we are trying to find backup OT who can backup at both RT and LT on game day. Perhaps we want a better backup at LT than Britt.

  6. Ochmed Jones

    Ochmed Jones Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    5,756
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +15 / 2 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    If Britt or O'Callahan can claim the RT position, then I would feel much better with Kazcur at RG as opposed to Yates or Hochstien.

    I do think that Neal starts the year on the PUP and even if he does return after that, he might not be the player he was in 2006.
  7. unoriginal

    unoriginal Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,268
    Likes Received:
    78
    Ratings:
    +229 / 3 / -1

    There is little chance they move Wesley Britt to RG. The man is 6'8". Do you know how hard that would be to see or pass over?

    For comparison, Stephen Neal is 6'4". Tom Brady is also listed at 6'4".
  8. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,856
    Likes Received:
    127
    Ratings:
    +335 / 21 / -2

    Curiously, the patriots like to start players who have actually started and excelled at a particular positions, rather than start players who are scrubs at other positions and are of the right height.

  9. Ochmed Jones

    Ochmed Jones Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 21, 2004
    Messages:
    5,756
    Likes Received:
    10
    Ratings:
    +15 / 2 / -0

    #12 Jersey

    I do agree. It is very hard for a 6'8" player to come off the line with a flat back.
  10. SammyBlueCat

    SammyBlueCat Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

    Neal is really a 250 lb wrestler that eats & lifts a lot for football.
    This has taken a toll on his body. I posted a video of an interview
    he cut at a college wrestling tournament last winter. I will try to find it again.
  11. SammyBlueCat

    SammyBlueCat Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 2, 2005
    Messages:
    741
    Likes Received:
    1
    Ratings:
    +1 / 0 / -0

  12. Stanley

    Stanley Rookie

    Joined:
    Mar 6, 2008
    Messages:
    11
    Likes Received:
    0
    Ratings:
    +0 / 0 / -0

    I think Light would make an excellent guard, with the athleticism to pull on running plays.
    We have a lot of room for improvement at left tackle, imo. I think teams will be blitzing frequently, even though we play from shotgun and complete a lot of short passes. That is what led to most of our close wins last season, and our one loss.
  13. Deus Irae

    Deus Irae PatsFans.com Retired Jersey Club PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2006
    Messages:
    42,287
    Likes Received:
    520
    Ratings:
    +1,637 / 70 / -75

    Disable Jersey

    Matt Light is a Pro Bowl left tackle.
  14. Lloyd_Christmas

    Lloyd_Christmas I can delete my own crap! PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,420
    Likes Received:
    5
    Ratings:
    +5 / 0 / -0


    They are not moving Light from LT.

    Ross was a pretty good RT before being forced to play LT. I think we will see him start at RT and Kaczur move to RG. Of course, it all depends on who steps up, but that is how I see it right now. You don't want to disrupt the existing cohesion any more than you have to by shifting people all over the place. Moving Kaczur inside on the same side and starting Ross at RT makes the most sense to me.
  15. nashvillepatsfan

    nashvillepatsfan Rookie

    Joined:
    Feb 1, 2007
    Messages:
    3,213
    Likes Received:
    6
    Ratings:
    +6 / 0 / -0

    close wins? :confused: oh i get it, you were making a joke :D
  16. unoriginal

    unoriginal Rookie

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2006
    Messages:
    3,268
    Likes Received:
    78
    Ratings:
    +229 / 3 / -1

    Matt Light is also an All-Pro left tackle.
  17. mgteich

    mgteich PatsFans.com Veteran PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Sep 13, 2004
    Messages:
    20,856
    Likes Received:
    127
    Ratings:
    +335 / 21 / -2

    I think your analysis makes sense. We have a great left side of the line. There is no reason to break up the combination of Light-Mankins-Koppen.

    The question for camp is who steps up as the best pair on the right side. Right now we have Ross, Kaczur, Yates and O'Callaghan in the mix. Any two could end up as the starters.


  18. bradmahn

    bradmahn Rookie

    Joined:
    Dec 22, 2006
    Messages:
    2,008
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    It's foolish to leave Neal out of any discussion of the right side when none of us know his status other than he missed camps so far. Hell, we don't even know the extent of his injury.

    It's just as likely he'll be ready for the opener.
  19. captain stone

    captain stone Rookie

    Joined:
    Sep 29, 2004
    Messages:
    8,870
    Likes Received:
    87
    Ratings:
    +225 / 45 / -22

    No Jersey Selected

    Link, please?
  20. 363839

    363839 PatsFans.com Supporter PatsFans.com Supporter

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2005
    Messages:
    3,500
    Likes Received:
    2
    Ratings:
    +2 / 0 / -0

    No. He's not joking.
    In the 2nd half of the season, the games started getting very competitive for some reason. Remember Baltimore? How about Philly?
    All the blow outs came mainly in the first half of the season.
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page

unset ($sidebar_block_show); ?>