Kontradiction
On my retirement tour.
PatsFans.com Supporter
2020 Weekly Picks Winner
2021 Weekly Picks Winner
2023 Weekly Picks Winner
- Joined
- Oct 24, 2006
- Messages
- 68,286
- Reaction score
- 76,690
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.
In respect to trade value, I'm certainly not in favour of giving up too much for him. I certainly wouldn't trade a 3rd straight up. I might stretch to a 4th but even that's unlikely.
However I would consider, for example, swapping our 4th for their 5th, or our 3rd for their 4th and a late round pick next year.
Knowing BB however, what's more likely to happen is that we re-sign Hoyer long-term when he realises there's no market for him and trade Mallett to the Broncos who have no backup presently for their 3rd rounder and Tebow or something similar.
Alternatively, the Broncos have pick 57. If BB is likely to move out of pick 31 as is most likely considering his track record, trade pick 31 for Broncos 57, a 2013 2nd and Tim Tebow. With three second rounders, we can always move back up if needed.
I fail to see how that's an equitable swap for the Patriots given that depends on the status of Brian Hoyer. What happens if Mallett beats out Hoyer in 2012 (assuming Hoyer stays) and then is rides Tom Brady right to the line similar to the Drew Bledsoe scenario?Tebow for Mallet
I think both teams win, and neither team loses much:
Mallet won't see the field in any meaningful way for the next few years with the Pats, and if Hoyer is resigned, Mallet won't be needed as Hoyer could serve as backup. If Hoyer walks, then its still good to have Mallet around.
Pats would use Tebow in occassional situations -- and maybe Brady & Josh can teach Tebow how to be a pocket passer -- which could turn out to be great in the long run
Broncos get a good backup with starter capability after Manning retires in 3 years.
Broncos get rid of Tebow -- keeping him just isn't an option for them
I fail to see how that's an equitable swap for the Patriots given that depends on the status of Brian Hoyer.
So he's pretty much left with signing the tender or agreeing on a longer deal for less than the tender
What happens if Mallett beats out Hoyer in 2012 (assuming Hoyer stays) and then is rides Tom Brady right to the line similar to the Drew Bledsoe scenario?
I'm intrigued by Mallett. Rated as a first round prospect and most Pro-ready QB. Years of development behind Brady given the attributes he has sure does raise some potential questions. Then again, they could be completely unfounded.
Mallett for Tebow is one of the most ridiculous ideas I've seen on here, Mallett can actually play QB and will probably be Brady's replacement.
I think Mallet is likely to overtake Hoyer if they both stay. But I don't see Mallet overtaking Brady for the next 3 years -- its possible but not probable. So I'd rather take Tebow being a contributor today + Tebow's potential over Mallet's potential.
Talking about Tebow coming here is not fun, it is annoying and makes me think that people are sipping the moronic tebow aid. Seriously, how can talk radio be full of tebow talk, the Patriots have just gone a a FA spending extravaganza, specifically in the WR realm and all they are talking about is Tim Tebow. What a friggin waste!!!
Tebow isn't coming here, he wouldn't have any role in the Patriots offense, he is a bad QB and he won't learn how to get better. Tebow will be a forgotten memory in 3 years.
damn ...Tebow is a like a pimple that wont go away ..until someone pops him...
I know that people that...mention trading Mallet for Tebow are total morons. Lets see..trading a quarterback with a rocket arm and alot of potential for a quarterback with a crappy arm and can do some running and is one hit from being retired....oh I feel so great after 4 years (after TB retires) having tebow run our team and run while we wasting the talent of all our receivers running around ......wow I see BB saying ...we are going to be a running team and trade our good receivers for blockers.....so tebow can run and run .....
people get off drugs .....will you ..damn ....
I agree... The thought of Tebow playing a non-QB role is about as unlikely as Aaron Hernandez playing Running Back.... Or a LB playing Tight End... Or a WR playing DB.
Belichick and McDaniels just don't do things like that.
The reality is that Belichick was interested enough in him two years ago to work him out and take him to dinner quite visibly in the North End, which he doesn't do with every Draft prospect; in fact, I think I could count on one hand the number of Draft prospects for whom Belichick did something like that, but right now I'm having trouble coming up with number two. In addition, Josh, back as OC, traded up 18 slots in the 2010 draft to take Tebow two slots ahead of Belichick, when no one else in those intervening 18 slots had expressed any interest in him.
So, yeah, it's plenty fun to talk about it. If you don't like it, don't reply.
And, I wouldn't call picking up a bunch of guys on a flyer to see how they work out in Training Camp (Lloyd excepted) "a FA spending extravaganza."
As for Tebow in three years? My crystal ball is out of order this morning.
And, BTW, the premise of my comment was, to use your words, that "Tebow isn't coming here."
There's only room for one alpha QB on a team.
I point you to the Celtics of '08.
After the team obtained Ray Allen and Kevin Garnett, there was some speculation of a scenario like that happening, but as Allen put it, right after the 2 came to Boston, they both decided this was Paul Pierce's team, and neither one of them had a problem with that.
What makes you think Tim Tebow wouldn't handle the situation in the same manner?