- Joined
- Jan 22, 2005
- Messages
- 31,024
- Reaction score
- 15,582
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.My .02 here is that it would cost a mill to cut Brady and 3 mill to play him, so I think we retain him.
I'm not one who normally argues for cutting folks--especially productive ones--but that's why I'm asking (I know dryheat, among others, has suggested taking him): is it possible that, even in 2008, the Pats could get equal/better production out of Cottam and save $1.5M or so?
Isn't Cottam a slower version of Watson? Only injured more than Watson? (If that is possible.)
Isn't Cottam a slower version of Watson? Only injured more than Watson? (If that is possible.)
Is Ben Watson Fast? That's news to me because i don't remember Watson running away from ANY LB's or Safeties in this league.
I put his grade at 56. And the fact that he missed almost the entire 2007 season didn't help his cause. Really, I don't see taking him with the Raiders third as a good pick. There should be a bunch of good RB's still on the board, and a few good LB's, CB's, and O-linemen still available.