SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Maybe I missed it, but when was it said the first time?KDPpatsfan said:For the last time...if a team is found guilty of tampering thier pick does not go to another team. they simply lose the pick. So if the Jets were ever found guilty, the pick they lost would simply dissapear. The Pats would not get it.
Kind of what I was thinking. Perhaps the Patriots are prepared to argue that the Jets offer was intended solely to harden Branch's holdout?Ahriman said:I'm pretty sure it has something to do with Chayuts connection to the Jets. There was some talk in last week about Chayut supposedly asking for a favor from the Jets by having them offer Branch a contract when they never intended to trade for him. Something along those lines, anyway.
No team is going to make an offer before the season under the table for a player that will still be a guaranteed offer remaining after the season ends. The Jets must have had some contact outside the designated time period, but I can't really establish any real motive for doing such.RAWKY said:If this tampering charge is true it would go a long way toward explaining Branch's resolve.....let us not forget Milloy was negociating until someone in the background made an offer at the last minute and suddenly he no longer wanted to talk about redoing his contract so we had to cut him....
One of the mysterys in this whole thing was why was Branch unwilling to even counter Pat's offer except to say do not franchise me and i will report to work....which does not make sense unless Branch believed he had a golden parachute to land with...
RAWKY said:If this tampering charge is true it would go a long way toward explaining Branch's resolve.....let us not forget Milloy was negociating until someone in the background made an offer at the last minute and suddenly he no longer wanted to talk about redoing his contract so we had to cut him....
One of the mysterys in this whole thing was why was Branch unwilling to even counter Pat's offer except to say do not franchise me and i will report to work....which does not make sense unless Branch believed he had a golden parachute to land with...
Maybe part of Pat's reasons for allowing trade talk was to flush out the PERP.
5 Rings for Brady!! said:Let's not forget that the Raiders tried to hire Mangini and got Ryan from the Pats instead and then blatantly tampered with Ted Washington. Washington had a deal in place at the moment free agency began, and I believe was on a jet within minutes if I remember the whole story.
Tampering cannot be proven, and happens all the time. The Pats have been major victims of tampering and have seen no justice from the NFL of any kind.
Ted Wasington's plane supposedly left Boston for SF before midnght when FA began.5 Rings for Brady!! said:Let's not forget that the Raiders tried to hire Mangini and got Ryan from the Pats instead and then blatantly tampered with Ted Washington. Washington had a deal in place at the moment free agency began, and I believe was on a jet within minutes if I remember the whole story.
Tampering cannot be proven, and happens all the time. The Pats have been major victims of tampering and have seen no justice from the NFL of any kind.
I think the misunderstanding people have for this goes all the way back to the Parcells/Jets incident of '97. We got draft picks for releasing Parcells from his contract, not for any tampering (which the Jets were definitely guilty of).KDPpatsfan said:For the last time...if a team is found guilty of tampering thier pick does not go to another team. they simply lose the pick. So if the Jets were ever found guilty, the pick they lost would simply dissapear. The Pats would not get it.
PATSNUTme said:Who knows what evil lies in the heart of Mangini?
I would assume that this took place before the "permission" was given. Has to be, if true.