Halifax_Pats_Fan
In the Starting Line-Up
- Joined
- Dec 30, 2005
- Messages
- 3,616
- Reaction score
- 1,342
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Crazy how we used to play the CB right up at the WR - must be the rule changes that have changed that for us.
Law is one thing, O T I S was big and physical but not all that skilled or fast at that point. I'm not sure he'd be playing like that with today's rules.helps to have ty law who is now a fatty cakes and otis.
Law is one thing, O T I S was big and physical but not all that skilled or fast at that point. I'm not sure he'd be playing like that with today's rules.
Listed at 5'11", 190 - not all that big I guess but bigger than we've got and he played big.how big was OTIS?
That was my reaction watching the lineups scroll by at the startI always loved BB line to Pioli after the game "Can you believe we won with this team?"
Honestly, I don't think the defense was about the same. We gave up the same number of points (2 more this year) and from a quick look at scoring stats, scoring is about the same now as it was then.It's kind of strange watching than years offense, I've gotten use to this years crisp moving one. This feels like Bronze Ages. The defense was better though.
No kidding. I wonder how much more money he ended up getting than we offered. It's hard to believe we haven't been in a SB since he left, it seems like forever ago when he was here now.Wish we had Law on the other side from Samuel. What a solid tandem that would be.
No kidding. I wonder how much more money he ended up getting than we offered. It's hard to believe we haven't been in a SB since he left, it seems like forever ago when he was here now.