- Joined
- Feb 19, 2007
- Messages
- 17,450
- Reaction score
- 16,969
I think the rules committee has to be put in check. Is it really neccessary to change rules to a game that everyone loves every single year.
They should meet every year and propose things but changes should only be put to a vote every 5 years or so and I think there should also be a player rep and a coaches rep with a vote at these things 34 votes instead of just the 32 owners (maybe even a refs rep vote and a fan rep vote too for 36 votes).
It is starting to become a yearly ritual at these meetings that we have to sit and wait for them to make some change to the game that makes it more ***** or that changes the way the sport has been played for years and we are forced to ***** and moan until the season starts and then the rules start effectign outcomes of games and really cause *****ing and moaning.
They should meet every year and propose things but changes should only be put to a vote every 5 years or so and I think there should also be a player rep and a coaches rep with a vote at these things 34 votes instead of just the 32 owners (maybe even a refs rep vote and a fan rep vote too for 36 votes).
It is starting to become a yearly ritual at these meetings that we have to sit and wait for them to make some change to the game that makes it more ***** or that changes the way the sport has been played for years and we are forced to ***** and moan until the season starts and then the rules start effectign outcomes of games and really cause *****ing and moaning.