SITE MENU
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.I've got news for you, NUT -- they do polygamy there too!
From Wikipedia:
In Hong Kong, polygamy was banned in October 1971. [11][12] [13] However, it is still practised in Hong Kong and Macau. One example of this is Stanley Ho. Another is Lim Por Yen [14]. Some Hong Kong businessmen have concubines across the border in mainland China.[4]
Man-Lun Ng, M.D.of Humboldt University of Berlin reported the situation in Hong Kong: it was estimated that out of the approximately two million married couples in Hong Kong, about three hundred thousand husbands had mistresses in China (1996). In 1995, 40% of extramarital affairs involved an enduring long-term relationship with a stable partner. [15]
International Herald Tribune Kevin Murphy had reported the cross-border polygyny phenomenon in Hong Kong in 1995. [16]
The traditional attitude toward mistresses is reflected in the saying: "wife is not as good as concubine, concubine is not as good as prostitute, prostitute is not as good as secret affair, secret affair is not as good as the affair you want but can't get" (妻不如妾, 妾不如妓, 妓不如偷, 偷不如偷不到)[17]
Screw that... we need Rodney in the White House.I'm hiring Rodney as my public relations director when he retires from football.
Rodney is the man. lets get randy now because I trust what Rodney says.
Screw that... we need Rodney in the White House.
I think you misinterpret what Rodney said to indicate he'd welcome the opportunity. That's not what I get from those comments. He basically said if he's an ass (which that comment seems to indicate Rodney is under the impression he in fact is) we would not tolerate him. He didn't say we would handle him in such a way that he wouldn't be an ass.
These guys are all going to back BB's play on any move up to a point. But as someone on WEEI pondered yesterday, do we really want to add to the leadership load of guys like Brady and Bruschi and Rodney or are we better served letting them focus as much of their individual attention as possible on playing their own position to the best of their ability. Who cuts back on film work on Wednesday because that's his day to make sure Randy is on track?
Even moreso than Stallworth, Randy is a guy I would only take on if he were compensation free and willing to play on a let me prove to you and my critics I can still play and not ultimately become a disappointing and disgruntled pain in the ass contract. And neither of those two circumstances are likely to present themselves.
1) I think you misinterpret what Rodney said to indicate he'd welcome the opportunity. That's not what I get from those comments. He basically said if he's an ass (which that comment seems to indicate Rodney is under the impression he in fact is) we would not tolerate him. He didn't say we would handle him in such a way that he wouldn't be an ass.
2) These guys are all going to back BB's play on any move up to a point. But as someone on WEEI pondered yesterday, do we really want to add to the leadership load of guys like Brady and Bruschi and Rodney or are we better served letting them focus as much of their individual attention as possible on playing their own position to the best of their ability. Who cuts back on film work on Wednesday because that's his day to make sure Randy is on track?
3) Even moreso than Stallworth, Randy is a guy I would only take on if he were compensation free and willing to play on a let me prove to you and my critics I can still play and not ultimately become a disappointing and disgruntled pain in the ass contract. And neither of those two circumstances are likely to present themselves.
in Prov to address a turf convention, never knew they had conventions, once again speaks his mind about a couple of issues.. thank goodness he is on our side. Not a lot of insight as to whether or not he will be ready for TC in July though.