tedster822
Rookie
- Joined
- Mar 7, 2005
- Messages
- 39
- Reaction score
- 0
Registered Members experience this forum ad and noise-free.
CLICK HERE to Register for a free account and login for a smoother ad-free experience. It's easy, and only takes a few moments.Reche if given the chance could be this teams #2 WR. Screw Keyshawn.BelichickFan said:Yeah, I was about to post that. I'd be interested in him as a #3 WR . . . with Keyshawn as #2.
He does fit the Patriots' profile of decent size, more quick than fast, etc. And I do trust Belichick's judgement but I would be nervous penciling him in at #2. But I'm not expert on him, I don't watch a lot of Charger games.SeanBruschi54 said:Reche if given the chance could be this teams #2 WR. Screw Keyshawn.
BelichickFan said:He does fit the Patriots' profile of decent size, more quick than fast, etc. And I do trust Belichick's judgement but I would be nervous penciling him in at #2. But I'm not expert on him, I don't watch a lot of Charger games.
LOL, I guess I was a little off when I said that. I was thinking of the calls for a big 6'3" type WR but you're right.patsox23 said:By the way, I think I'm going nuts. In what world does a 6', 215 guy "fit the Patriots' profile of decent size?" He's a GIANT by our standards.
As they say about Belichick "He can take his and beat yours or he can take yours and beat his".AndyJohnson said:In essence, Caldwell here is better than Caldwell there, Givens here is better than Givens in Tenn, or if he were in SD.
AndyJohnson said:Caldwell hasnt produce very much, but it isnt beyond reason to me that plugging him into our system with Brady slinging the rock would end up with as much, or close to as much production as we got from Givens.
My opinion is that BBs decision was that Givens production was as much a product of the system as Givens ability. If that is correct, then BB would feel he can bring in a similarly talented player and the production would be much more for us than in the system they played in.
For my money Reche Caldwell is a much better WR in our system with Tom Brady than in SDs Martyball system with Drew Brees.
In essence, Caldwell here is better than Caldwell there, Givens here is better than Givens in Tenn, or if he were in SD. I actually think that is unquestionable. The question is how much the gap closes.
The "WR plan" may be that we let a guy go who will be paid for what our system allowed him to do, and bring in guys who will be paid for what a lesser system allowed them to do.
In other words, we add VALUE>
mgcolby said:He drops a lot of footballs that he has no business dropping. I think he has a case of the Seattle's.
mgteich said:As last year, we need a bunch of guys to compete for several roster spots. It really doesn't matter whether he'd end up as a #2, a #3, a #4 or a #5. We need them all, and BTW, can he return kicks or punts?