- Joined
- Sep 13, 2004
- Messages
- 37,727
- Reaction score
- 16,528
I have no clue what you are talking about. "We haven't" what?
Do you disagree with either of two "facts" below.
FACTS
Gaffney and Washington were not re-signed
Galloway and Lewis were both signed to compete for the #3 spot.
==================================================
I agree that our #3 receiver Edelman was injured and that our #4 is now the number 3. Galloway had BECOME irrelevant in the last three weeks and was #6 as you indicate.
Do you disagree with either of two "facts" below.
FACTS
Gaffney and Washington were not re-signed
Galloway and Lewis were both signed to compete for the #3 spot.
==================================================
I agree that our #3 receiver Edelman was injured and that our #4 is now the number 3. Galloway had BECOME irrelevant in the last three weeks and was #6 as you indicate.
No, we haven't.
Aiken had already passed Galloway on the depth chart, as had Slater. Part of that is their special teams play, but they were the guys being put in the 4 and 5 wide sets, or subbing out other guys, because they were actually active. We cut our #6 WR, and then our #3 got hurt.
I would expect Tate, if he plays in the next couple weeks, to be the #4, and only go in during 4-wide sets, as that only needs him to know a small subset of the playbook.